May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Variability in Quantitative Measures of Diplopia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. A. Leske
    Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
  • S. R. Hatt
    Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
  • J. M. Holmes
    Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D.A. Leske, None; S.R. Hatt, None; J.M. Holmes, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant EY015799 (JMH), Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., and Mayo Foundation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 1806. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. A. Leske, S. R. Hatt, J. M. Holmes; Variability in Quantitative Measures of Diplopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):1806.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To determine variability over time of three different methods of quantifying diplopia in adults with clinically stable strabismus: Diplopia Questionnaire (DQ), cervical range of motion (CROM) and Goldmann perimeter.

Methods: : Consecutive assessments using the DQ, CROM, and Goldmann were compared in 15 adults with clinically stable paralytic or restrictive strabismus. Diplopia was scored from 0 points (pts) (no diplopia) to 100 pts (diplopia in all measured positions of gaze) for each method. Stability was defined as no historical or objective evidence of change, including ≤10 prism diopters change by prism cover tests in primary position over 2 consecutive exams (less than 1 year apart, range 5-364 days, median 78 days). The median diplopia score change was compared between the tests, and 95% limits of agreement, with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI), were calculated for each method.

Results: : Changes ranged from -40 to 8 pts for the DQ, -60 to 16 pts for the CROM, and -68 to 18 pts for the Goldmann. Overall, there was no systematic bias toward increasing or decreasing scores over time and median changes were similar across tests (DQ 0 pts, CROM 0 pts, Goldmann -4 points, P>0.3 for all comparisons). 95% limits of agreement were numerically better for the DQ (24 pts 95% CI: 12 to 36 pts), followed by the CROM (44 pts 95% CI: 23 to 65 pts), followed by the Goldmann (50 pts 95% CI: 21 to 80 pts), but these comparisons were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: : All three methods of quantifying diplopia had substantial variability over time in clinically stable patients. Possible sources of variability include small, clinically undetected changes in the underlying conditions over the short and long term, changes in patient adaptation to the condition, and true variability in the tests. Variability of measured diplopia over time needs to be considered in clinical practice and when designing and conducting clinical trials in strabismus.

Keywords: strabismus • strabismus: diagnosis and detection • esotropia and exotropia 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.