May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Topographical Analysis of Retinal Recovery Processes With a Three Flash Stimulus in Multifocal Electroretinography and LED Stimulation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • B. A. E. Mazinani
    Ophthalmology, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
  • E. Merx
    Ophthalmology, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
  • A. W. A. Weinberger
    Ophthalmology, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
  • P. Walter
    Ophthalmology, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  B.A.E. Mazinani, None; E. Merx, None; A.W.A. Weinberger, None; P. Walter, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 2221. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      B. A. E. Mazinani, E. Merx, A. W. A. Weinberger, P. Walter; Topographical Analysis of Retinal Recovery Processes With a Three Flash Stimulus in Multifocal Electroretinography and LED Stimulation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):2221. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To examine retinal recovery processes topographically by the application of three-flash-sequences with specific interstimulus intervals

Methods: : 11 healthy subjects underwent multifocal ERG testing with an LED stimulator (Roland Consult, Wiesbaden, Germany). Every stimulation step consisted of a three flash sequence with 20 ms between the first and the second and 30 ms between the second and the third flash. The interval between the third and the first flash of the next step was 80 ms. Based on the interstimulus interval dependent amplitude reductions of the multifocal ERG response for these three intervals (higher amplitude reductions with short intervals), the complete curve of the recovery kinetics was determined. Half-life periods of these recovery kinetics were calculated for 5 different rings of retinal excentricity.

Results: : The mean half-life period of the amplitude recovery across all subjects in the central area was 24.32 ms, 23.16 ms in ring 2, 22.73 ms in ring 3, 17.13 ms in ring 4 and 14.78 ms in the most peripheral ring 5 with significant differences between rings 1 and 2, 3 and 4, 1 and 3, and 3 and 5 (p<0,05).

Conclusions: : The kinetics of the amplitude recovery after short interstimulus intervals showed a strict spatial distribution with faster recovery towards the macular periphery. Further studies will show, if different pathologies have specific influences on retinal recovery processes and if their analysis can contribute to the diagnostic capacity of the mfERG.

Keywords: electroretinography: clinical • electroretinography: non-clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×