May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Progression of Myopia in an Adult Population
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. A. Bullimore
    College of Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • G. L. Mitchell
    College of Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • L. A. Jones
    College of Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • K. S. Reuter
    College of Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.A. Bullimore, None; G.L. Mitchell, None; L.A. Jones, None; K.S. Reuter, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grants R01-EY012952 and R24-EY014792
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 2606. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. A. Bullimore, G. L. Mitchell, L. A. Jones, K. S. Reuter; Progression of Myopia in an Adult Population. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):2606. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Our previous retrospective study (Bullimore et al. IOVS 2002;43:2110-2113) reported a five-year rate of myopia progression (at least -0.75 D) of 35.7% in 291 adults aged 20-40 years. The Study of Progression of Adult Nearsightedness (SPAN) is a five-year observational study to determine the risk factors associated with adult myopia progression. Here we report five-year progression data.

Methods: : Subjects between 25 and 35 years of age, with at least -0.50 D spherical equivalent of myopia (cycloplegic auto-refraction), were recruited from the faculty and staff of The Ohio State University. Progression was defined as an increase in myopia of at least -0.75 D spherical equivalent as determined by cycloplegic auto-refraction. Annual testing included visual acuity, non-cycloplegic auto-refraction and auto-keratometry, phoria, accommodative lag, response AC/A ratio, cycloplegic auto-refraction, videophakometry, ultrasound, and partial coherence interferometry (IOLMaster).

Results: : Three-hundred ninety-six subjects were enrolled in SPAN. The mean (± SD) age at baseline was 30.7 ± 3.5 years, 66% were female, 80% were Caucasian, 11% were African-American, and 8% were Asian/Pacific Islander. The mean level of myopia (spherical equivalent) was -3.54 ± 1.77 D. At the time of submission, 219 subjects had completed their five-year follow up visit. Of these, 10 (4.6%) had confirmed progression of -0.75 D with a mean increase of -1.05 ± 0.25 D and a mean increase in axial length of 0.39 ± 0.24 mm. Using the less conservative criteria of -0.50 D gave a progression rate of 15.5%, a mean progression of -0.76 ± 0.24 D and a mean increase in axial length of 0.27 ± 0.19 mm.

Conclusions: : The progression of myopia in adults is less common than previously reported. Assuming that a 0.1 mm increase in axial length is associated with 0.25 D of myopia progression, the majority of the myopia progression in this cohort is due to axial length elongation.

Keywords: myopia • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: risk factor assessment • refractive error development 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×