May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Clinical and Electrophysiological Evaluation Following Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K. Ikeda
    Ophthalmology, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
  • S. Mizunoya
    Ophthalmology, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
  • Y. Kanaya
    Ophthalmology, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
  • H. Kanai
    Ophthalmology, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
  • A. Hosoda
    Ophthalmology, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
  • H. Abe
    Ophthalmology, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
  • H. Kidahashi
    Ophthalmology, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
  • M. Suzuki
    Ophthalmology, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  K. Ikeda, None; S. Mizunoya, None; Y. Kanaya, None; H. Kanai, None; A. Hosoda, None; H. Abe, None; H. Kidahashi, None; M. Suzuki, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 2712. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K. Ikeda, S. Mizunoya, Y. Kanaya, H. Kanai, A. Hosoda, H. Abe, H. Kidahashi, M. Suzuki; Clinical and Electrophysiological Evaluation Following Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):2712.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To determine the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab injection in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods: : Nine consecutive patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO received an intravitreal injection of 1.25mg/0.05ml bevacizumab. Patients had a complete ophthalmic evaluation including visual acuity testing, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fluroscein angiography, electroretinography (ERG), and pattern reversal visual evoked potential (VEP) at baseline and at follow-up visits.

Results: : The follow-up period was >2 months. The mean best-corrected visual acuity in logMAR units improved from 0.93 at baseline to 0.50, 0.55 at 1 and 2 months. The mean foveal thickness was 651 µm at baseline and decreased to 461, 342, 295, and 428 µm at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months (P <0.01). The mean amplitudes and implicit times of the a- and b-waves of the ERGs were not significantly changed 2 weeks after the injection compared to the baseline values. The amplitudes and latencies of P100 of the VEPs were not significantly changed at 2 weeks. No adverse side effects were observed following the injection.

Conclusions: : An intravitreal injection of bevacizumab results in significant short-term improvement of visual acuity and macular edema secondary to BRVO. No ocular toxicity or adverse effects were observed by clinical and electrophysiological examinations.

Keywords: retina 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×