May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Detection of Significant Refractive Error With SureSight Vision Screener and Retinomax Autorefractor
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. T. Kulp
    College of Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • Vision In Preschoolers Study Group
    College of Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.T. Kulp, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Supported by NEI/NIH, DHHS grants: U10EY12644; U10EY12547; U10EY12545; U10EY12550; U10EY12534; U10EY12647; and U10EY12648.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 3132. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. T. Kulp, Vision In Preschoolers Study Group; Detection of Significant Refractive Error With SureSight Vision Screener and Retinomax Autorefractor. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):3132. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of the SureSight Vision Screener and Retinomax Autorefractor to detect specific refractive errors (hyperopia, myopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia).

Methods: : As part of the VIP Study, 1446 Head Start preschool children had refractive error measured by the SureSight Vision Screener (child mode) and Retinomax Autorefractor, followed on a later day by cycloplegic retinoscopy by a masked pediatric eyecare professional. Significant refractive errors on cycloplegic retinoscopy were defined as: hyperopia >+3.25D in any meridian; myopia > -2.00D in any meridian; astigmatism > 1.50D between principal meridians; and anisometropia > 1.00D interocular difference in hyperopia (most hyperopic meridian), or > 3.00D interocular difference in myopia (most myopic meridian), or > 1.50D interocular difference in astigmatism. The ability of the SureSight and Retinomax measurements to identify each refractive error was summarized by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve using all possible cutpoints for defining failure. Detection of refractive error type was based upon the child’s worse eye and using the following SureSight and Retinomax

Results: : most positive meridian for hyperopia, most negative meridian for myopia, cylinder for astigmatism and maximum of intereye difference in the sphere and cylinder for anisometropia.Results: The criterion for significant refractive error was met by 168 children for hyperopia, 25 for myopia, 156 for astigmatism and 94 for anisometropia. Area under the ROC curve was greatest for myopia and astigmatism (SureSight:0.95; Retinomax:0.96), followed by hyperopia (SureSight:0.83; Retinomax:0.88), and anisometropia (SureSight:0.78; Retinomax:0.67). Comparison of area under ROC curves revealed no significant difference between instruments for myopia and astigmatism, but significantly better performance by Retinomax for hyperopia (p = 0.03) and significantly better performance by SureSight for anisometropia (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: : Detection of significant refractive error with SureSight Vision Screener and Retinomax Autorefractor was very good for astigmatism and myopia, good for hyperopia, and fair for anisometropia. Neither machine was uniformly better than the other for all four targeted conditions.

Clinical Trial: : NCT00038753

Keywords: refraction 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.