May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Technician Training and Reproducibility of Drusen Measurement
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • B. Tate
    Economics, San Diego State University, Los Gatos, California
  • G. Wu
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
  • G. Tso
    Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California
  • V. Chen
    Ophthalmology, Los Gatos Community Hospital, Los Gatos, California
  • R. Chen
    California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California
  • D. A. Lee
    Ophthalmology, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
  • C. S. Wang
    Ophthalmology, Los Gatos Community Hospital, Los Gatos, California
  • D. Pham-Le
    San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California
  • J. Lee
    Kinesiology, Occidental College, Los Angeles, California
  • J. Mo
    Univeristy of California, San Diego, California
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  B. Tate, None; G. Wu, None; G. Tso, None; V. Chen, None; R. Chen, None; D.A. Lee, None; C.S. Wang, None; D. Pham-Le, None; J. Lee, None; J. Mo, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 3227. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      B. Tate, G. Wu, G. Tso, V. Chen, R. Chen, D. A. Lee, C. S. Wang, D. Pham-Le, J. Lee, J. Mo; Technician Training and Reproducibility of Drusen Measurement. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):3227. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To determine whether training will improve reproducibility in measurements.

 
Methods:
 

A retinal surgeon (MD) and three trainees (TR) measured a single drusen of the same digital photograph daily over the course of sixteen days using the Topcon camera 50EX, OIS Winstation-XP 3200, V.10.2.44. Training was the time the trainee had exposure to the Topcon camera system. The MD trained each of the trainees. Each user was masked to any previous measurement. Reproducibility was evaluated with Shewhart process control analysis, Bland-Altman repeatability coefficients, and coefficient of variance, all techniques to analyze variability and reproducibility in measurements.

 
Results:
 

TRs ranged in training from four weeks to one day. TR 1 (4 weeks), TR 2 (3 days), TR 3 (2 days), MD (4 years). Lesion measurement: MD Range: 221-281um, TR 1 Range: 154-248 um, TR 2 Range: 221-328um, TR 3 Range: 228-315um.Shewhart analysis indicated that two measurements by the least trained user fell outside of two standard deviations, indicating the presence of variation in the measurement process.  

 
Conclusions:
 

The MD measurements had a smaller repeatability coefficient and coefficient of variance than the trainees suggesting a correlation between training and reproducibility. This small study suggests that ophthalmic measurements can be recorded and analyzed for improved training techniques.

 
Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques • age-related macular degeneration • drusen 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×