May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Evaluating the Influence of Oval Pupils on the Fitting of Zernike Polynomials
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. A. Berntsen
    College of Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • D. O. Mutti
    College of Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • K. Zadnik
    College of Optometry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D.A. Berntsen, None; D.O. Mutti, None; K. Zadnik, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grants: K12-EY015447 & T32-EY013359 and an AOF Presidents Circle Ezell Fellowship (DAB)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 3319. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. A. Berntsen, D. O. Mutti, K. Zadnik; Evaluating the Influence of Oval Pupils on the Fitting of Zernike Polynomials. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):3319. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

Because most aberrometry software only fits circles with diameter equal to the minor axis of an oval pupil, additional processing is needed to utilize all data from peripheral measurements. We evaluate the effect on the central Zernike polynomial fit of including missing data and data outside the circular diameter of the oval pupil minor axis.

 
Methods:
 

A peripheral measurement 30º temporal on the retina from the line of sight was made on the dilated right eye of thirty subjects using the Complete Ophthalmic Analysis System (COAS; AMO WaveFront Sciences). Subjects ranged in age from 23 to 45 years (mean ± SD = 31 ± 6.7 years), and central spherical equivalent refractive error ranged from +0.63 to -8.41 D (mean ± SD = -2.63 D ± 2.05 D). A 6-mm analysis diameter within the minor axis of the oval pupil was used to analyze the data with the COAS software. Complete Light Analysis System (CLAS-2D; AMO WaveFront Sciences) software was then used to draw an analysis circle with diameter equal to the major axis of the oval pupil, which includes missing data outside the oval pupil. Using methods described by Schwiegerling (2002), CLAS-2D Zernike coefficients through 6th order were scaled down to a 6-mm pupil diameter and compared to 6-mm COAS Zernike results. Paired t-tests were used to compare the 6-mm Zernike coefficients and RMS errors calculated by these two methods.

 
Results:
 

The mean differences and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) are shown in Table 1 for total RMS (2nd to 6th order), higher-order RMS (3rd to 6th order), Z(3,1), Z(3,-1), and Z(4,0). Although three of the differences calculated were significantly different than zero, the mean differences are not clinically meaningful. For a 6-mm pupil, the largest significant mean difference and LoA (for total RMS error) were equivalent to 0.03 D and ±0.11 D of spherical defocus, respectively.  

 
Conclusions:
 

Drawing an analysis circle equal to the major axis of an oval pupil, which includes missing data and data outside the diameter of the minor axis of the oval, does not have any substantial influence on the wavefront fit within the minor axis diameter. Additional work is necessary to validate the wavefront fit outside the smaller diameter.

 
Keywords: aberrations 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×