Purchase this article with an account.
G. A. Gibson, L. N. Davies, J. S. Wolffsohn; Cognitive and Visual Function in Phakic and Pseudophakic Eyes: An Intraocular Lens Filter Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):3342. doi: https://doi.org/.
Download citation file:
© ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)
To examine the effect of short-wavelength intraocular lens (IOL) filters on cognitive and visual function in phakic and pseudophakic eyes.
Twenty-four phakic eyes of 24 subjects (mean age 26.8±6.0 years) and 22 eyes of 22 subjects fitted with a standard IOL (mean age 74.1±9.1 years) were assessed. Measurements of visual acuity (logMAR), contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson and CSV 1000-E), colour discrimination (Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue), reading speed (MNRead) and scotopic sensitivity (SST-1) were performed. In addition, the phakic cohort also performed a cognitive function test (two-alternative forced-choice paradigm) and short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). Each phakic subject wore three tinted spectacle lenses in a randomised sequence; an additional short-wavelength filter was introduced for the pseudophakic group. Three of the four filters were matched to the transmission characteristics of the Alcon AcrySof Natural, Bausch & Lomb VioletShield and the AMO OptiBlue (pseudophakic only) violet-blocking IOLs. The control condition was a UV blocking filter.
In the phakic cohort, mean defect scores for SWAP were found to be significantly higher with the AcrySof Natural tinted lens (-2.14 ± 1.85 dB) compared to the VioletShield (-1.34 ± 1.92 dB) and the control lens (-1.09 ± 1.65 db; p<0.01). Further, cognitive function was attenuated with the AcrySof Natural lens compared to the VioletShield, and the control lens (p<0.05). All other outcome measures were comparable between conditions. The different transmission characteristics of the filters, however, had no influence on the visual performance of the pseudophakic group.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only