May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Comparison of Topography-Guided Lasik (tgl) to Standard Lasik (sl) for Hyperopia: Is It Important to Adjust for Angle Kappa?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. N. Nam
    Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • G. Pamel
    Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • A. J. Kanellopoulos
    Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • H. D. Perry
    Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.N. Nam, None; G. Pamel, None; A.J. Kanellopoulos, None; H.D. Perry, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 3356. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. N. Nam, G. Pamel, A. J. Kanellopoulos, H. D. Perry; Comparison of Topography-Guided Lasik (tgl) to Standard Lasik (sl) for Hyperopia: Is It Important to Adjust for Angle Kappa?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):3356. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Alignment errors during photoablation lead to decentration and nonhomogenous ablation patterns. Thus, proper centration of the ablation zone during refractive procedures is an essential goal. In this study, we compared the safety and efficacy of TGL versus SL in hyperopes. We evaluated the effect of adjusting for angle kappa in LASIK treatments.

Methods: : 35 patients were treated with topography-guided LASIK in one eye and standard LASIK in the other. The Wavelight and Intralase systems were used. Refraction, UCVA, BSCVA, angle kappa, effective ablation diameter (EAD), wavefront analysis (WA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) were evaluated up to 18 months post-operatively. All laser treatments were conducted at the Laservision Institute in Athens, Greece.

Results: : TGL: The mean UCVA improved from 20/48 (SD+/-0.23) pre-operatively to 20/23 (SD+/- 0.173) post-operatively. 69% of eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of the refractive goal. None of the eyes lost more than 1 line of BSCVA. The mean regression between months one and 3 for TGL and SL was +0.32 D and +0.55 D respectively. The relative deviation from the ablation center to the optical axis center was 0.5mm.

Conclusions: : Ou studies demonstrate that TGL and SL are safe and effective methods for treating hyperopia. TGL with correction of angle kappa appears to be superior in regard to regression, residual astigmatism and effective ablation diameter.

Keywords: refractive surgery 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×