Purchase this article with an account.
G. E. Noguera, J. Castro-Combs, M. Cano, M. Yew, P. Gehlbach, A. Behrens; Amniotic Fluid Effects on Corneal Epithelial and Stromal Wound Healing in an ex vivo Organ Culture Model. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):3391. doi: https://doi.org/.
Download citation file:
© ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of topical human amniotic fluid (HAF) and equine amniotic fluid (EAF) on corneal reepithelialization and stromal wound healing.
New Zealand white rabbit corneas (n=52) were placed in an ex vivo air-interface organ culture. An 8.5 mm-diameter mark in the center of the cornea was produced with a hand trephine. A #15 surgical blade was used to scrape the epithelial layer within the demarcated area. The corneas were assigned to one of 4 treatment groups (n=8): fetal bovine serum (FBS), HAF, EAF, and a control that was exposed to phosphate buffer solution (PBS). Corneal epithelial defects were imaged every 8 h for 72 h after fluorescein application. Five corneas of each group were used for histology, proliferation, and apoptosis assay.
There was no significant difference in the mean rate of closure of the corneal epithelial defect between FBS-treated corneas and controls (p>0.06). The mean epithelial defect area (MEDA) was significantly smaller in the EAF group as compared to control corneas at 24 h (p=0.016), 40 h (p=0.032), 64 h (p=0.008) and 72 h (p= 0.007) following epithelial scrape. The MEDA in the HAF group was significantly smaller at 16 h (p= 0.008), 64 h (p= 0.0072), and 72 h (p= 0.016) compared to the control group. The MEDA in the HAF and EAF groups was smaller at all time points as compared to the FBS group, but the difference was not significant. At histology, the mean keratocyte density was significantly higher in the anterior stroma in the HAF (p=0.015), and EAF groups (p=0.016) as compared to control group. The number of BrdU positive keratocytes were significantly higher in the superficial, medial and deep stromal sub-areas in the HAF group compared to control (p=0.028). EAF and FBS treated corneas also showed a higher number of BrdU positive cells compared to control but this difference was significant only in the medial corneal sub-area of EAF group (p=0.028). Finally, we did not observed any difference in the amount of TUNEL positive keratocytes among the different groups.
Our data indicates that the topical application of HAF and EAF is associated with accelerated reepithelialization in this cornea organ culture model. Similarly, corneal keratocyte density appears to be less affected after epithelial injury using this treatment. This protective effect on corneal keratocyte density seems to be the result of a higher proliferation rate in the HAF and EAF treated groups.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only