May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Multifocal Electroretinogram in Birdshot Chorioretinopathy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R. Hera
    Ophthalmology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble cedex 09, France
  • S. Berthemy- Pellet
    Ophthalmology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble cedex 09, France
  • C. Chiquet
    Ophthalmology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble cedex 09, France
  • J.-P. Romanet
    Ophthalmology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble cedex 09, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R. Hera, None; S. Berthemy- Pellet, None; C. Chiquet, None; J. Romanet, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 3906. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R. Hera, S. Berthemy- Pellet, C. Chiquet, J.-P. Romanet; Multifocal Electroretinogram in Birdshot Chorioretinopathy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):3906.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To describe multifocal electroretinogram (m ERG) at the baseline examination of 15 patients in a longitudinal cohort study of Birdshot chorioretinopathy and to identify relation ship between mERG and visual acuity, perimetry, ocular symptoms and VFQ 25 score.

Methods: : Single center cross-sectional study. mERG was evaluated with a corneal electrode ERG Jet and with an Ganzfeld optoelectrical stimulator performed by Metrovision. Relationship between N1, P1 and N2 waves values and automated perimetry (MD and PSD), LogMAR visual acuity and VFQ 25 scores were evaluated.

Results: : N1 and P1 waves values and N1/P1 ratio were decreased in the 15 degrees central area of the retina. These alterations are less important in the peripheral retina. With the use of univariate analyses, there were significant associations between mERG and MD(r=0,37, p=0,05), logMAR visual acuity (r=0,48,p=0,01) , and VFQ25 score(r=-0,5,p=0,01).

Conclusions: : In our study mERG map could identify early disease activity whereas visual acuity or visual field alone does not fully reflect the severity of disease. Electroretinographic results suggested an alteration of the inner retina. Studies of mERG parameters in this series will be further studied after one or two years or evolution.

Keywords: electroretinography: clinical • chorioretinitis • imaging/image analysis: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×