May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Characteristics of Visual Field Defects in Acquired Brain Injury: A Retrospective Analysis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • N. Kapoor
    Clinical Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • I. B. Suchoff
    Clinical Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • K. J. Ciuffreda
    Clinical Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • E. Han
    Clinical Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • D. Rutner
    Clinical Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • S. Craig
    Clinical Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  N. Kapoor, None; I.B. Suchoff, None; K.J. Ciuffreda, None; E. Han, None; D. Rutner, None; S. Craig, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 4451. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      N. Kapoor, I. B. Suchoff, K. J. Ciuffreda, E. Han, D. Rutner, S. Craig; Characteristics of Visual Field Defects in Acquired Brain Injury: A Retrospective Analysis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):4451. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To determine retrospectively the frequency of occurrence of visual field defects in a sample of visually-symptomatic, ambulatory outpatients who have acquired brain injury (ABI), either mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) or cerebrovascular accident (CVA).

Methods: : The medical records of 220 individuals treated in the Raymond J. Greenwald Rehabilitation Center (RJGRC) either with mild TBI (n=160) or CVA (n=60) were reviewed retrospectively using a computer-based query spanning the years 2000-2003. Records were reviewed to determine the frequency of specific visual field defects: scattered, restricted, homonymous, non-homonymous, lateralized, and altitudinal.

Results: : In the total ABI sample of 220, 102 (46.4%) individuals were diagnosed with one of the targeted visual field defects, with 62/160 (38.8%) for TBI and 40/60 (66.7%) for CVA, respectively. For TBI, the frequency of occurrence of visual field defects was: scattered (36/62=58.1%), restricted (10/62=16.1%), lateralized (16/62=25.8%), homonymous (14/62=22.6%), non-homonymous (2/62=3.2%), and altitudinal (0/62=0%). For CVA, the frequency of occurrence of visual field defects was: scattered (8/40=20%), restricted (5/40=12.5%), lateralized (27/40=67.5%), homonymous (19/40=47.5%), non-homonymous (8/40=20%), and altitudinal (1/40=2.5%, which was also homonymous).

Conclusions: : Identification and comparison of the frequency of occurrence of visual field defects in the TBI and CVA samples with earlier studies that have reported on just one of these groupings revealed similar frequencies for TBI and slightly lower frequencies for CVA. Visual field integrity can be assessed in peri-personal and/or extra-personal space with either kinetic or static targets. Since RJGRC used static targets for testing in extra-personal space only, this may be one reason why there was no evidence of visual inattention for either subgroup and a lower percentage of visual field defects in the CVA group. The increased frequency of occurrence (46.4%) of visual field defects in this study's ABI sample will adversely quality of life, such as reading, ambulation, and driving.

Keywords: visual fields • visual impairment: neuro-ophthalmological disease • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: prevalence/incidence 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×