May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Cortical Responses to the Patterned versus Natural Visual Stimuli on Rats
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Kim
    Neuro-Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Ear & Eye Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts
    Center for Innovative Visual Rehabilitation, Boston VA Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
  • R. Jensen
    Center for Innovative Visual Rehabilitation, Boston VA Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
  • J. F. Rizzo, III
    Neuro-Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Ear & Eye Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts
    Center for Innovative Visual Rehabilitation, Boston VA Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S. Kim, None; R. Jensen, None; J.F. Rizzo, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Veterans Affair
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 4499. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Kim, R. Jensen, J. F. Rizzo, III; Cortical Responses to the Patterned versus Natural Visual Stimuli on Rats. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):4499. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Studies on processing in primary visual areas usually use artificial patterned stimuli such as bars or gratings. As a result, little is known about the properties of activity patterns for the natural stimuli processed by the visual system. Furthermore, most results of electrophysiological study in rats have been obtained using limited number of recording electrodes. We conducted this study to verify the differences between the cortical responses to the patterned stimuli and those to the natural ones and to analyze the correlation among the multiple responding units.

Methods: : Using the Sprague-Dawley rats, we performed the multi-single unit recording of the primary visual cortex using 32-channel multi-electrode array. For visual stimulation, we used various artificial patterns (light, bar, checkerboard and grating sinewave) and images of natural objects (animals, natural scenes and foods) those are flickering or moving. The signals acquired from the recording electrodes were sorted and analyzed to get activity map, spike ratio, and spike-triggered cross-correlation matrix.

Results: : Comparing the results from the patterned stimuli, natural ones didn’t show generalized increase of spike rate regardless of the orientation and motion of the stimuli. But we could find more recruitment of previously silent cells and significantly increased cross correlation among cells in results from natural stimuli.

Conclusions: : Natural objects didn’t make the generalized increase of the visual cortical responses but rather triggered the active and complex neuronal connection. This results can be explained by the influence from the secondary/association area or activation of different processing mechanism.

Keywords: visual cortex • electrophysiology: non-clinical • shape, form, contour, object perception 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×