May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Clinical Outcomes After Intraocular Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Patients With Anterior Segment Neovascularization: A Comparative Case Series
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Charles
    Department of Ophthalmology, Univ of Tennessee Health Sci Ctr, Memphis, Tennessee
  • P. Netland
    Department of Ophthalmology, Univ of Tennessee Health Sci Ctr, Memphis, Tennessee
  • A. P. C. Lupinacci
    Department of Ophthalmology, Univ of Tennessee Health Sci Ctr, Memphis, Tennessee
  • J. Calzada
    Department of Ophthalmology, Univ of Tennessee Health Sci Ctr, Memphis, Tennessee
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S. Charles, None; P. Netland, None; A.P.C. Lupinacci, None; J. Calzada, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 4578. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Charles, P. Netland, A. P. C. Lupinacci, J. Calzada; Clinical Outcomes After Intraocular Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Patients With Anterior Segment Neovascularization: A Comparative Case Series. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):4578.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the influence of intraocular bevacizumab on clinical outcomes in patients with elevated intraocular pressure and neovascularization of the iris and anterior chamber angle.

Methods: : Retrospective comparative case series: 30 consecutive patients with anterior segment neovascularization (ASN) treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) after August 2005 and 30 age-, gender- and race-matched patients with ASN treated without IVB, before August 2005. VA was stratified into three categories: (1) less than 20/200; (2) between 20/200 and 20/60 and (3) better than 20/60.

Results: : Mean age was 68±10 years on the bevacizumab group and 66±13 years on the non-bevacizumab group (p= 0.398). The mean follow-up time was 9.1±6.3 mo in the bevacizumab group and 8.6±6.2 mo in the non-bevacizumab group (p=0.796). The majority of patients were diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy (IVB n=19, control n=20) followed by CRVO (IVB n=8, control n=7), p=0.166. No significant difference was observed in initial VA, gonioscopy, angle neovascularization, and iris neovascularization (p= 0.179; 0.065; 0.373 and 0.981, respectively). No significant difference was observed in initial mean IOP (IVB 40±14 mmHg, control 43±13 mmHg, p= 0.432) and mean number of glaucoma medications (IVB 3±2 medications, control 3±1 medications, p= 0.307). At final examination, no significant difference was observed in mean IOP (IVB 17±10 mmHg, control 15±11 mmHg, p= 0.628), mean glaucoma medications (IVB 1±1 medications, control 1±1 medications, p= 0.44) and presence of ASN (p=0.699). Final VA better than 20/60 was achieved in 6 patients in the bevacizumab group and none in the non-bevacizumab group (p=0.013). In the bevacizumab group 18 patients required glaucoma surgery, whereas 30 patients in the non-bevacizumab group required glaucoma surgery(p<0.001), usually with glaucoma drainage implant.

Conclusions: : Intravitreal bevacizumab for anterior segment neovascularization significantly improves visual outcomes and significantly decreases need for glaucoma surgery.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: treatment/prevention assessment/controlled clinical trials • intraocular pressure • anterior segment 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×