May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Inter-Observer Reproducibility of Heidelberg Retinal Flowmetry Utilizing Pixel by Pixel Analysis: Reading Center Analysis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C. Rospigliosi Lopez
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • A. Harris
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • B. Siesky
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • I. BenZion
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • D. Moore
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • R. Ehrlich
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • L. Kagemann
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Eye and Ear Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  C. Rospigliosi Lopez, None; A. Harris, None; B. Siesky, None; I. BenZion, None; D. Moore, None; R. Ehrlich, None; L. Kagemann, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  In part by an unrestricted Research Grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 4603. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C. Rospigliosi Lopez, A. Harris, B. Siesky, I. BenZion, D. Moore, R. Ehrlich, L. Kagemann; Inter-Observer Reproducibility of Heidelberg Retinal Flowmetry Utilizing Pixel by Pixel Analysis: Reading Center Analysis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):4603. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : The purpose of this investigation was to determine the inter-observer reproducibility of Heidelberg retinal flowmeter (HRF) blood flow measurements performed by two independent observers utilizing a pre-set reading center protocol with independently selected areas for pixel by pixel analysis.

Methods: : Blood flow analysis was performed on 257 scans from 15 patients with primary open angle glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension. Capillary perfusion in a 2560x640 µm area of the superior temporal peripapillary region was recorded and pixel by pixel analysis was performed by two independent observers. Measurements were taken from an area adjacent to the optic disc with a minimum of 1600 pixels collected by each observer. Each observer using a pre-set reading center protocol independently selected the area for their analysis. The percentage of pixels with less than 1 unit of flow (zero flow) and 10, 25, 50, 75, and 90th percentile flow values of total flow were calculated. Inter-observer variability was assessed by estimating the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Bland-Altman plots of the difference between the two observers versus the average of the two observers for each outcome were created.

Results: : ICC was 0.79 (range: 0.74-0.83) for HRF mean retinal blood flow values of the superior temporal peripapillary region. For zero flow, 10, 25, 50, 75 and 90th percentiles of flow, the ICC and ranges were 0.67 (0.60-0.73), 0.74 (0.68-0.79), 0.82 (0.78-0.86), 0.85 (0.82-0.88), 0.85 (0.81-0.88) and 0.77 (0.72-0.82), respectively.

Conclusions: : This study demonstrates that independent observers utilizing a pre-set reading center protocol can review HRF retinal capillary blood flow scans and obtain statistically similar results. We report acceptable reproducibility in both the number of zero flow pixels as well as within the stratified percentiles of total retinal blood flow utilizing the pixel by pixel method.

Keywords: image processing • imaging/image analysis: clinical • blood supply 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×