May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Interobserver Reproducibility of Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomograph and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Aliyeva
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • F. Berisha
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • T. Roshdy
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • N. Pfeiffer
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • E. M. Hoffmann
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S. Aliyeva, None; F. Berisha, None; T. Roshdy, None; N. Pfeiffer, None; E.M. Hoffmann, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 4621. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Aliyeva, F. Berisha, T. Roshdy, N. Pfeiffer, E. M. Hoffmann; Interobserver Reproducibility of Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomograph and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):4621.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To compare the interobserver reproducibility of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements provided by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) and the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT).

 
Methods:
 

Eighty-nine eyes of 53 glaucoma subjects and healthy controls underwent confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (HRT III; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) and Fourier-domain OCT (RTVue; Optovue Inc., Fremont, USA). The contour lines were traced by two glaucoma specialists and one observer with no previous HRT or OCT experience. The agreement between observers was assessed for OCT and HRT disc area, cup area, rim area, cup volume, rim volume, cup-to-disc ratio and RNFL measurements using ANOVA based intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV).

 
Results:
 

The mean ICC for FD-OCT measurements was almost perfect to perfect (between 0.95 and 1.0) for all measured parameters, except for the rim volume, that had a substantial agreement (ICC = 0.74). The mean OCT RNFL thickness showed best agreement between observers (ICC = 1.0). The CV values for FD-OCT parameters ranged between 0.3% and 12.2%. All HRT parameters demonstrated almost perfect interobserver agreement (between 0.90 and 0.98). The corresponding CV values ranged between 6.1% and 10.4%. The CV interobserver agreement for RNFL was significantly better for FD-OCT compared to HRT measurements (p<0.01), while HRT showed a better reproducibility for rim volume than FD-OCT (p<0.05). The mean values of FD-OCT and HRT parameters for each observer are presented in table 1.

 
Conclusions:
 

A newly available Fourier-domain optic coherence tomography enables highly reproducible measurements of optic disc and RNFL parameters. Both FD-OCT and HRT showed a minor influence of operator-dependent contour line placement. The observers’ experience was found to be an unsubstantial factor to influence the results of the measurements.  

 
Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • optic disc • nerve fiber layer 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×