May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Values Using Stratus-OCT and HRT-III
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. Moreno-Montanes
    Dpt. Ophthalmology, Clinica Univ. de Navarra Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • A. Antón
    Dpt. Ophthalmology, Institut Catalá de la Retina, Barcelona, Spain
  • N. García
    Dpt. Ophthalmology, Clinica Univ. de Navarra Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • A. Fernandez-Hortelano
    Dpt. Ophthalmology, Clinica Univ. de Navarra Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • A. Morilla
    Dpt. Ophthalmology, Institut Catalá de la Retina, Barcelona, Spain
  • M. Fallon
    Dpt. Ophthalmology, IMAS, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J. Moreno-Montanes, None; A. Antón, None; N. García, None; A. Fernandez-Hortelano, None; A. Morilla, None; M. Fallon, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 4627. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. Moreno-Montanes, A. Antón, N. García, A. Fernandez-Hortelano, A. Morilla, M. Fallon; Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Values Using Stratus-OCT and HRT-III. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):4627. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the usefulness of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-III (HRT-III) in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes and compare the thickness measurements using HRT-III and Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography-3 (OCT-3).

Methods: : Sixty-nine normal eyes, 60 ocular hypertensive eyes, and 111 glaucomatous eyes were included. All participants underwent visual field testing using the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm and the 24-2 program (Humphrey Field Analyzer), HRT-III, and OCT-3 examinations. Patients were classified into three groups according to intraocular pressure and visual field damage. Glaucomatous visual fields were those with a sensitivity defect in three contiguous altered locations (glaucoma definition) or abnormal glaucoma hemifield tests (GHT). The sensitivity/specificity of RNFL thickness measurements and RNFL thickness classifications using HRT-III and OCT-3 were calculated and compared to the visual field classification. The sensitivity/specificity of the height variation contour (HVC) from the HRT-III were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and areas under the ROC were plotted. Agreement between these parameters and other HRT-III parameters was calculated using Bland-Altman method and the k coefficient.

Results: : The RNFL thickness sensitivity/specificity were 7.2%/98.6% (most specific criteria), and 32.4%/87% (least specific criteria), respectively, for the HRT-III and 58.65%/98.55% (most specific criteria), and 72.97%/81.15% (least specific criteria) for the OCT-3 in relation to the glaucoma definition. Similar sensitivities/specificities were found compared to the GHT. The RNFL thickness sensitivities/specificities were lower in early glaucoma. The RNFL thickness measured with the HRT-III was related to the visual field parameters (P<0.05). The areas under the ROC for RNFL measurements were 0.72 using HRT-III, 0.86 with OCT-3 (P=0.001), and 0.54 for the HVC. The k coefficient was 0.36. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed that the RNFL measurements were not interchangeable.

Conclusions: : The sensitivity of RNFL damage detection using HRT-III was lower compared with OCT-3, especially in early glaucoma. RNFL thickness agreement between HRT-III and OCT-3 was only fair. HVC was not useful for glaucoma detection.

Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • nerve fiber layer • intraocular pressure 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×