May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Dynamic Videokeratoscopy and Tear Surface Quality With Soft Contact Lenses
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • B. J. Straker
    Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
  • M. Kopf
    Studiengang Augenoptik, Fachhochschule Aalen, Aalen, Germany
  • F. Yi
    Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
  • R. Iskander
    Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
  • M. J. Collins
    Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  B.J. Straker, None; M. Kopf, None; F. Yi, None; R. Iskander, None; M.J. Collins, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 4830. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      B. J. Straker, M. Kopf, F. Yi, R. Iskander, M. J. Collins; Dynamic Videokeratoscopy and Tear Surface Quality With Soft Contact Lenses. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):4830.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : The aim of this study was to investigate changes in tear film surface quality after commencing soft contact lens wear.

Methods: : Tear film surface quality was assessed using dynamic videokeratoscopy with a modified Medmont E300 videokeratoscope. Reflected images of the Placido disk are captured at 25 frames per second during the interblink period. A quantitative value of tear surface quality is derived for each frame, based on image processing analysis of the raw Placido ring images (not the derived topography). Eleven young subjects participated in the study. They were screened to ensure that their tear characteristics were within normal limits. Dynamic videokeratoscopy measurements were taken three times per day; in the morning (8-10 am), at lunchtime (12-2 pm), and in the afternoon (4-6 pm). This was done on two baseline days (bare eye) and on the first and seventh days of lens wear for a conventional hydrogel lens and following a week of no lens wear, for a further week of silicone hydrogel lens wear. Additional tests to assess the tear film were also conducted and each subject was asked to rate (analogue scale) the subjective dryness of their eyes.

Results: : All lens wear measurements showed a significant worsening of the tear film surface quality compared to bare eye baseline measurements (repeated measures ANOVA, p<0.01). A significant diurnal change was found on the first day of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear, where the tear film surface quality improved during the day (p=0.045). However, no diurnal changes were found in the tear film surface quality for the other lens wearing days or for the baseline bare eye condition (p>0.05). The subjective rating of dryness correlated with tear surface quality values for the bare eye condition (Pearson's p=0.04) and approached significance for the lens wearing conditions (hydrogel p=0.13 and silicone hydrogel p=0.21).

Conclusions: : The measurement of tear film surface quality using dynamic videokeratoscopy does differentiate between bare eye and lens wearing conditions. It also shows a systematic improvement in tear surface quality during the first day of silicone hydrogel lens wear.

Keywords: cornea: tears/tear film/dry eye • imaging/image analysis: clinical • contact lens 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×