May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Acuity and Quality of Vision After Cataract Surgery and Acritec Acri.Lisa 356d Implantation: Clinical Evaluation, Preliminary Results
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • G. Marchini
    Ophthalmology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
  • E. Pedrotti
    Ophthalmology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
  • E. Mazzilli
    Ophthalmology, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, S. Giovanni Rotondo Hospital, Foggia, Italy
  • L. Buzzonetti
    Ophthalmology, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, S. Giovanni Rotondo Hospital, Foggia, Italy
  • M. Passilongo
    Ophthalmology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
  • P. Viola
    Ophthalmology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
  • A. Laborante
    Ophthalmology, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, S. Giovanni Rotondo Hospital, Foggia, Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  G. Marchini, None; E. Pedrotti, None; E. Mazzilli, None; L. Buzzonetti, None; M. Passilongo, None; P. Viola, None; A. Laborante, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 5672. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      G. Marchini, E. Pedrotti, E. Mazzilli, L. Buzzonetti, M. Passilongo, P. Viola, A. Laborante; Acuity and Quality of Vision After Cataract Surgery and Acritec Acri.Lisa 356d Implantation: Clinical Evaluation, Preliminary Results. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):5672. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate acuity and quality of vision after cataract surgery with implantation of bifocal optic intraocular lens ACRITEC Acri.Lisa 356D.

Methods: : 14 eyes (10 patients) underwent phacoemulsification and Acri.Lisa 356D IOL implantation with a follow-up of 6 months. The postoperative main visual outcome evaluations were: uncorrected (UCDVA) and best corrected (BCDVA) distance visual acuity (Snellen), uncorrected (UNVA) and best distance-corrected (BDCNVA) near visual acuity (De Wecker) and mean addition to reach De Wecker (DW) 1 on the reading chart. Contrast sensitivity study (CSV-1000 HGV instrument, Vector Vision Inc.) was also conducted.

Results: : In our study we found the following mean values: UCDVA 7,38±2,93, BCDVA 10,00±0,00; UNVA 0,98±0.44 DW, BDCNVA 0,98±0.44 DW. Mean refractive error spherical equivalent (SE) was -0,40±0,45 D. Mean contrast sensitivity under standard instrument light level of 85 cd/mm was 5,00±1,63 at 3 cpd, 4,00±2.16 at 6 cpd, 3,75±0,96 at 12 cpd and 4,25±2,06 at 18 cpd. Mean contrast sensitivity under glare condition was 5,62±1,33 at 3 cpd, 4,15±1,46 at 6 cpd, 3,46±1,85 at 12 cpd, 2,85±1,82 at 18 cpd.

Conclusions: : Implantation of ACRITEC Acri.Lisa 356D bifocal optic IOL provides very satisfactory far and near vision restoration. Contrast sensitivity with and without glare seems to remain on normal ranges of standard monofocal pseudophakic eye.

Keywords: presbyopia • refractive surgery: optical quality • intraocular lens 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×