May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Comparison of Digital Fundus Photographic and Echographic Measurements From Eyes With Choroidal Melanoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Y. Kim
    Ophthalmology, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Republic of Korea
  • T. Hwang
    Casey Eye Institute,
    OHSU, Portland, Oregon
  • D. Choi
    Casey Eye Institute, Public Health & Preventive Medicine,
    OHSU, Portland, Oregon
  • D. Wilson
    Casey Eye Institute,
    OHSU, Portland, Oregon
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Y. Kim, None; T. Hwang, None; D. Choi, None; D. Wilson, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  in part by an unrestriced grant to Casey Eye Institute from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 5951. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Y. Kim, T. Hwang, D. Choi, D. Wilson; Comparison of Digital Fundus Photographic and Echographic Measurements From Eyes With Choroidal Melanoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):5951.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Accurate assessment of tumor size is critical in treating choroidal melanoma. Echographic measurements are most commonly used, but suffer from intra- and inter-observer variability in measuring tumor maximal linear dimensions (MLD). Digital fundus photographic systems can create a montage that clearly documents the tumor margins. This image can then be used to measure tumor MLD.Few reports compare measurements of tumor MLD by digital fundus photography versus echography. The following study was undertaken to evaluate the potential value of a digital imaging system in measuring the MLD of choroidal melanoma.

Methods: : We studied 27 eyes in 21 patients recruited between September 2006 and August 2007. Inclusion criteria were: 1) Echographic and digital fundus photographic examination were performed on the same day, and 2) Fundus photography yielded a montage that clearly defined tumor margins.The MLD were measured as follows: for echography, transverse and longitudinal diameters were measured following the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) standardized echographic protocol, and the larger dimension was selected as the MLD. For fundus photography, the tumor margin was outlined with an electronic pen and the MLD calculated by software (ANKA).

Results: : The mean MLD of all tumors recorded were 9.44 mm by echography and 10.50 mm by digital fundus photography. The echographic and photographic measurements of MLD agreed within 1 mm for 13 eyes (48%), 2 mm for 22 eyes (80%) and 3 mm for 25 eyes (93%).Tumor measurements by photography exceeded echographic measurements in 22 eyes (80%). In cases in which the echographic measurement exceeded the photographic measurement, the measurements generally differed by 1 mm.

Keywords: melanoma • imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • choroid 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×