May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Outcomes of Combined Vitreoretinal and Anterior Segment Procedures
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. S. Liao
    Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
    Ophthalmology, Tufts New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
  • J. S. Heier
    Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D.S. Liao, None; J.S. Heier, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 5989. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. S. Liao, J. S. Heier; Outcomes of Combined Vitreoretinal and Anterior Segment Procedures. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):5989.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : In patients requiring surgical management of vitreoretinal diseases, there is often concomitant anterior segment pathology. Combined vitrectomy and anterior segment surgery provides the benefit of a single procedure with less postoperative recovery time. However, combined surgery presents a unique set complications. In this study, we describe operative outcomes and complications of combined vitreoretinal and anterior segment surgery for various disease states.

Methods: : A retrospective review of 154 patients (158 eyes) undergoing combined pars plana vitrectomy with various anterior segment procedures. Indications for vitrectomy included IOL subluxation (45), complex cataract (60), retained lens fragments (8), aphakia (5), retinal detachment (8), complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (7), macular hole (2), epiretinal membrane (14), glaucoma (4), and silicone oil removal (5). Mean followup time was approximately 6 months (187 days).

Results: : Visual acuity improved or remained stable in 88.7% of eyes. Common complications included hyphema (5.0%), elevated IOP (4.4%), RD (5.0%), CME (3.1%), and hyptony (2.5%). Some complications had a higher incidence depending on the type of procedure, such as hyphema associated with removal of dislocated IOL (13.3%).

Conclusions: : Combination vitrectomy and anterior segment surgery is a viable alternative to sequential procedures for a variety of disease states. In this relatively large case series, there was good visual rehabilitation with a low rate of complications.

Keywords: vitreoretinal surgery • retina • anterior segment 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.