May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin) for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Radiation From Iodine-125 Brachytherapy for Choriodal Melanomas
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • G. Gupta
    Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
  • J. Nielsen
    Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
  • R. Schroeder
    Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships G. Gupta, None; J. Nielsen, None; R. Schroeder, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 252. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      G. Gupta, J. Nielsen, R. Schroeder; Intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin) for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Radiation From Iodine-125 Brachytherapy for Choriodal Melanomas. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):252.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To examine the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin, Genetech, Inc., San Francisco, CA) for the treatment of ischemic macular edema secondary to radiation from iodine-125 brachytherapy for choriodal melanomas.

Methods:: Retrospective chart review of 2 patients previously treated for choriodal melanomas with iodine-125 brachytherapy and who had macular edema on both clinical exam and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan. Both patients were treated with 1.25 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab and then followed for 3 months. Patients underwent a pre-injection OCT scan and fluorescein angiography. Monthly OCT scans were then obtained for a total of three months. The primary outcome measure was retinal surface contour map and thickness as measured by OCT. Secondary outcome measure was vision.

Results:: Neither patient had any significant improvement in macular edema 3 months post injection. Macular thickness and contour maps remained essentially unchanged. The patients’ pre-injection visual acuity was 20/400 and 20/60: both remained unchanged during the course of treatment.

Conclusions:: Intravitreal bevacizumab may not be beneficial in the treatment of macular edema secondary to radiation retinopathy. This effect may be due the ischemic nature of the edema and prompts the need for further exploration into the efficacy and safety of using anti-angiogenic compounds in the treatment of macular edema from ischemic etiologies.

Keywords: melanoma • radiation therapy • tumors 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×