May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Pegaptanib Sodium for the Treatment of Macular Edema Following Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO): Anatomical Outcomes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. S. Patel
    Retina Research Institute of Texas, Abilene, Texas
  • Macugen in CRVO Study Group
    Retina Research Institute of Texas, Abilene, Texas
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships S.S. Patel, Pfizer Inc, C.
  • Footnotes
    Support Research supported by Pfizer Inc. and (OSI) Eyetech, Inc.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 311. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. S. Patel, Macugen in CRVO Study Group; Pegaptanib Sodium for the Treatment of Macular Edema Following Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO): Anatomical Outcomes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):311.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To assess the safety and efficacy of pegaptanib in treating macular edema secondary to CRVO in a phase 2 trial.

Methods:: A prospective, multicenter, double-masked, sham-controlled, dose-finding trial enrolled subjects with CRVO of ≤6 months duration. Required were best-correct visual acuity in the study eye of 65 to 20 ETDRS letters inclusive and central retinal thickness at the center point of ≥250 µm at baseline and first treatment day (determined by optical coherence tomography [OCT]). Subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to intravitreous pegaptanib sodium (0.3 mg, 1 mg) or sham injections every 6 weeks for 24 weeks; follow-up continued through 52 weeks. Panretinal photocoagulation for neovascularization was permitted according to the Central Vein Occlusion Study protocol. OCT was performed at weeks 6, 12, 30, 40, and 52. Endpoints at week 52 included mean changes from baseline in thickness at the center point and at the central subfield and percentages of subjects developing retinal or iris neovascularization.

Results:: Included were 98 subjects (0.3 mg and 1 mg, n=33; sham, n=32), of whom 52 were men; overall mean age at baseline was 61.8 years. Mean baseline thickness was relatively well balanced (0.3 mg, 687 µm; 1 mg, 642 µm; 674 µm, sham). At week 52, mean change from baseline in thickness at the center point was -295 µm, -216 µm, and -183 µm for the 0.3 mg, 1 mg, and sham groups, respectively, and at the central subfield was -291 µm, -210 µm, and -168 µm, respectively (P<0.05 for 0.3 mg vs sham). In all, 9%, 6%, and 9%, respectively developed retinal or iris neovascularization. No significant change in any group was noted in capillary nonperfusion for central subfield, inner subfields, or outer subfields.

Conclusions:: Treatment of macular edema due to CRVO with pegaptanib seems to provide anatomical benefits compared to sham. Further studies are needed to confirm selective VEGF inhibition as a therapeutic option for this unmet medical condition.

Clinical Trial:: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00088283

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: treatment/prevention assessment/controlled clinical trials • vascular occlusion/vascular occlusive disease • edema 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×