May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Corneal Central Pachimetry and Corneal Endothelial Damage After Cataract Surgery Using Traditional Phacoemulsification versus Fluid Based System Extraction
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. Richard
    Ophthalmology, Hopital de la Timone, Marseille, France
  • L. Hoffart
    Ophthalmology, Hopital de la Timone, Marseille, France
  • H. Proust
    Ophthalmology, Hopital de la Timone, Marseille, France
  • B. Ridings
    Ophthalmology, Hopital de la Timone, Marseille, France
  • J. Conrath
    Ophthalmology, Hopital de la Timone, Marseille, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships J. Richard, None; L. Hoffart, None; H. Proust, None; B. Ridings, None; J. Conrath, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 1079. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. Richard, L. Hoffart, H. Proust, B. Ridings, J. Conrath; Corneal Central Pachimetry and Corneal Endothelial Damage After Cataract Surgery Using Traditional Phacoemulsification versus Fluid Based System Extraction. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):1079. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To compare central corneal thickness and central corneal endothelial cell damage after conventional ultrasound phacoemulsification versus fluid-based phacoextraction.

Methods:: In a prospective randomized study, 42 eyes of 42 patients were divided in two groups of 21 patients each which underwent cataract surgery.Conventional ultrasound system was used in group 1, and a fluid-based system method in group 2. " Divide and conquer" phacoextraction technique with capsular bag lens implantation was performed in both groups.Only cataracts graded up to Nuclear opalescence 4.9 in the LOCS III classification were included in the study. We analyzed 5 different corneal parameters: endothelial cell density ( ECD ), hexagonality rate , endothelial cell area ( ECA ), coefficient of variation in cell size ( CV ) and central corneal pachymetry(CCP), before surgery and at 7, 30 and 90 days post-operatively .

Results:: Average Nuclear Opalescence was not significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (P=0,908). ECD decreased in both groups with a different curve. Maximum cell loss was observed at one month after surgery in group 1, whereas the maximum was seen at one week in group 2. There was no significant difference (p = 0.23 ).ECA increased at one month for the group 1 and at one week for the group 2 (p>0.180).An acute increase of CCP was found at one week for both groups (CCP: p=0.514).The hexagonality rate decreased in both groups with a similar curve and there was no significant difference.CV increased at one month in both groups with a similar curve (p=0.395).

Conclusions:: The Fluid-based extraction system was as safe as conventional ultrasound for cataract extraction for lenses graded up to nuclear opalescence 4.9 in the LOCS III classification. There was no mean difference in endothelial corneal damage between these two different techniques.

Clinical Trial:: local ethic commitee

Keywords: cataract • cornea: endothelium • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×