May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Frequency and Predictors of Poor Outcome in Ocular Bartonellosis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • T. Chae
    Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • T. Albini
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • E. Eggenberger
    Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
  • K. Golnick
    Cinncinati Eye Institute, Cinncinati, Ohio
  • M. Lee
    Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • R. Foroozan
    Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships T. Chae, None; T. Albini, None; E. Eggenberger, None; K. Golnick, None; M. Lee, None; R. Foroozan, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 702. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      T. Chae, T. Albini, E. Eggenberger, K. Golnick, M. Lee, R. Foroozan; Frequency and Predictors of Poor Outcome in Ocular Bartonellosis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):702.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To determine the frequency of poor outcome in ocular bartonellosis and potential predictors of poor outcome.

Methods:: A multicenter retrospective chart review was conducted. Inclusion criteria consisted of evidence of intraocular inflammation, positive serologic testing for B. henselae, and follow-up of at least 2 months. 42 patients from 5 different institutions were identified. 16 patients were excluded due to inadequate follow-up. 26 patients were included with average length of follow-up of 7.6 months. Data reviewed included patient age, visual acuity, fundus findings, systemic symptoms, and type of treatment. The primary outcome measurement was visual acuity of 20/40 or worse.

Results:: Visual acuity at initial evaluation ranged from 20/15 to counting fingers and fundus findings included: vitritis, optic nerve edema, macular edema, macular star, deep retinal lesions, CWS, serous retinal detachment, BRVO, and macular hole. 69% patients (18 patients, 60% eyes) had vision of 20/40 or worse at initial presentation. 23% patients (6 patients, 18% eyes) had vision of 20/40 or worse at final examination. All patients with a poor outcome had 20/40 or worse vision at presentation. No patients with better than 20/40 visual acuity at presentation had a poor outcome.

Conclusions:: The majority of patients (69%) presented with vision of 20/40 or worse. One third of these patients experienced a poor outcome of 20/40 vision or worse. No patients with better than 20/40 vision at presentation had a poor outcome.

Keywords: retinitis 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×