May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Ocular Paintball Injuries and Visual Outcome
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K. Alliman
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
  • J. Banta
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
  • W. Smiddy
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
  • Y. Qureshi
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
  • D. Miller
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships K. Alliman, None; J. Banta, None; W. Smiddy, None; Y. Qureshi, None; D. Miller, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support Unrestricted grant to the University of Miami from Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 717. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K. Alliman, J. Banta, W. Smiddy, Y. Qureshi, D. Miller; Ocular Paintball Injuries and Visual Outcome. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):717.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To describe ocular injuries attributable to paintball projectiles and subsequent medical/surgical intervention with resultant visual outcomes.

Methods:: Retrospective chart review of 36 eyes of 36 patients who sustained ocular injuries secondary to paintballs who were evaluated and treated at a single institution. Age, gender, laterality, setting, eye protection, visual acuity at presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and final visual acuity were reviewed.

Results:: Of the 36 patients injured, 31 (86%) were male. 34 (97%) were wearing no eye-protection device when injured. Visual acuity in 28 eyes (77%) was 20/200 or worse at presentation. The most common ocular finding at presentation was hyphema in 28 eyes (81%). 20 eyes (56%) were initially managed medically, however, 29 (81%) eventually required surgical intervention with 8 (22%) requiring enucleation. Final visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 13 eyes (36%) whereas 18 eyes (50%) were 20/200 or worse.

Conclusions:: Paintball-related ocular injuries are often severe and visually devastating. Ocular trauma secondary to paintball projectiles is not uncommon in an urban setting in which most injuries occur in uncontrolled, non-recreational settings. The vast majority of patients suffering paintball-related trauma are young males without eye protection. Following the blunt impact of a paintball, anterior segment injuries were found in well over ¾ of patients. Despite extensive surgical efforts, visual acuity at presentation strongly correlates with final visual acuity.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications • trauma 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×