May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Pathologic Optic-Disc Cupping After Optic Neuritis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • G. Rebolleda
    Ophtalmology, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  • S. Noval
    Ophtalmology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
  • F. J. Muñoz-Negrete
    Ophtalmology, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  • F. Arnalich-Montiel
    Ophtalmology, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  • J. L. Garcia-Perez
    Ophtalmology, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships G. Rebolleda, None; S. Noval, None; F.J. Muñoz-Negrete, None; F. Arnalich-Montiel, None; J.L. Garcia-Perez, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 915. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      G. Rebolleda, S. Noval, F. J. Muñoz-Negrete, F. Arnalich-Montiel, J. L. Garcia-Perez; Pathologic Optic-Disc Cupping After Optic Neuritis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):915.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose:: To determine with Optic Coherence Tomography (OCT) if cup-to-disc ratio modifies after a monosymptomatic optic neuritis.

Methods:: Fifty-eyes (50 patients) suffering a monocular acute optic neuritis were included and followed for at least one year. Estimation of Cup/Disk Area Ratio (CDAR) and Cup/Disk Vertical Ratio (CDVR) were made with OCT scanning (Fast optic disc strategy).

Results:: One year after the optic neuritis episode, the mean overall CDAR and CDVR were significantly higher in the affected eye compared with normal eye (0.5 ± 0.14 vs 0.39 ± 0.11 and 0.41 ± 0.18 vs 0.29 ± 1.6; P = 0.000 respectively). A CDAR and CDVR difference ≥ 0.2 was found in 13% and 23.2% of the eyes respectively. A statistically significant correlation was found between CDAR and CDVR difference with the average RNFL thickness (r = -0.688 and -0,551 respectively; P = 0.000). Correlations were also significant between CDAR and CDVR difference and the visual acuity in the affected eye at one year of follow-up (r = -0.651,-0.488 respectively; P = 0.000).

Conclusions:: Optic neuritis should be included in the list of entities causing pathological optic nerve cupping. Patient history, visual fields assessment and funduscopic findings are the key to unlocking the diagnosis of glaucomatous versus nonglaucomatous optic-disc cupping.

Keywords: neuro-ophthalmology: diagnosis • optic nerve • optic disc 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.