May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Frequency Doubling Perimetry in Neurological Visual Field Defects
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • E. F. Smith
    Ophthalmology, Downstate Ophthalmology Assoc, Brooklyn, New York
    Surgery, Department of Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York
  • E. C. Canellos
    Surgery, Department of Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York
  • P. D. Berg
    Ophthalmology, Downstate Ophthalmology Assoc, Brooklyn, New York
    Surgery, Department of Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York
  • A. Schrier
    Ophthalmology, Columbia Presbyterian Harkness Eye Institiute, New York, New York
  • P. Eze
    Surgery, Department of Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York
  • M. Fingeret
    Surgery, Department of Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships E.F. Smith, None; E.C. Canellos, None; P.D. Berg, None; A. Schrier, None; P. Eze, None; M. Fingeret, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 933. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      E. F. Smith, E. C. Canellos, P. D. Berg, A. Schrier, P. Eze, M. Fingeret; Frequency Doubling Perimetry in Neurological Visual Field Defects. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):933.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To evaluate the ability of frequency doubling technology using the FDT Matrix to identify and characterize neurologic visual field defects.

Methods:: 10 patients with known neurologic visual field defects underwent conventional 24-2 SITA standard testing and frequency doubling perimetry with the Matrix FDT 24-2-5 screening strategy.

Results:: Screening FDT detected 29 of 31 involved quadrants present on Humphrey 24-2 testing (93.0%). There were 9 of 45 quadrants falsely identified as involved (20%).

Conclusions:: Visual field defects which are caused by neurologic pathology are able to be identified and quantified by FDT at the same performance levels as conventional automated perimetry .There is a tendency for FDT perimetry to overestimate the VF defect in neurologic disease.

Keywords: neuro-ophthalmology: diagnosis • visual fields 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×