May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Clinical Validity of Contrast Sensitivity Perimetry: Assessing Eyes With Severe Glaucomatous Visual Loss
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. W. Dul
    Clinical Sciences, SUNY State College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • W. H. Swanson
    Indiana University School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships M.W. Dul, None; W.H. Swanson, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support NIH grant EY007716 and the Glaucoma Institute of SUNY
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 1608. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. W. Dul, W. H. Swanson; Clinical Validity of Contrast Sensitivity Perimetry: Assessing Eyes With Severe Glaucomatous Visual Loss. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):1608.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To assess the clinical utility of Contrast Sensitivity Perimetry (CSP) for assessing visual function in eyes with severe glaucomatous damage.

Methods:: Twenty-one patients with stable glaucoma were recruited for whom stereoscopic structural assessment of the optic nerve head and neural retinal rim was judged as cupped to the rim in quadrants corresponding to dense scotomas (sensitivities of 10 dB to < 0 dB) on conventional automated perimetry (CAP). One eye was chosen for each patient, and tested with CSP using 0.4 cycle/deg sinusoidal patches at 26 locations in the central visual field. CAP was performed with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II (stimulus size III, 24-2 SITA Standard algorithm). Test-retest variability was assessed for CSP with testing sessions one week apart. CAP variability was computed from recent 24-2 fields.

Results:: CSP values were highly repeatable in all quadrants with dense defects, with 95% confidence limits of +/- 3 dB. HFA values were highly variable in these same quadrants, with 95% confidence limits of +/- 15 dB. For the locations where the maximum CSP stimulus was below threshold on one test, on the other test it was below threshold for 86% of locations and for the remaining locations it was a never more than 3 dB above threshold (median 1 dB above threshold). For CAP, when the maximum stimulus was below threshold on one test it was below threshold for 81% of locations and for the remaining locations it was as much as 20 dB above threshold (median 8 dB above threshold).

Conclusions:: Contrast sensitivity perimetry (CSP) provided reliable measures of visual sensitivity with low variability in quadrants with dense scotomas where CAP measures had high variability and clinical optic nerve assessment found little if any visible neuroretinal rim. CSP may prove to be an effective means of following patients for continued progression when the lower extremes have been reached for the dynamic ranges of conventional functional and structural measures.

Keywords: visual fields • perimetry • optic nerve 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×