May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Reduction of Learning Effects in Studies of Multiple Parametric Tests in Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C. F. Brito
    Department of Psychology, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois
  • K. R. Woodward
    Veterans Administration Hospital, Iowa City, Iowa
  • C. A. Johnson
    Discoveries in Sight, Devers Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
  • C. K. Doyle
    Veterans Administration Hospital, Iowa City, Iowa
  • M. Wall
    Veterans Administration Hospital, Iowa City, Iowa
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships C.F. Brito, None; K.R. Woodward, None; C.A. Johnson, Welch Allyn, F; Welch Allyn, C; C.K. Doyle, None; M. Wall, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support VA Merit Review
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 1625. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C. F. Brito, K. R. Woodward, C. A. Johnson, C. K. Doyle, M. Wall; Reduction of Learning Effects in Studies of Multiple Parametric Tests in Glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):1625. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To examine how learning effects (performance improvements due to repeated testing) vary in glaucoma patients across four perimetry tests: size III SITA and size V full threshold methods of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA), as well as Matrix and Motion Perimetry (MP).

 
Methods:
 

About once a week for five weeks glaucoma patients (N=30) were given four perimetric tests: (1) HVA SITA standard Size III, (2) HVA Full-threshold Size V, (3) MP, and (4) Matrix. Participants had previous experience with perimetric testing. Each participant first received a SITA test (used for study eligibility) followed by the remaining three tests, administered in random order. On some occasions, tests had to be administered on multiple days. The average number of days between visits was 10. Mean dBs were computed across all test locations for each subject, for each test. A 4x5 (test type, visit number) repeated measures ANOVA was performed on the averaged dBs.

 
Results:
 

Significant learning effects between visits 1 and 5 were observed for MP (1.53 dB improvement) and Matrix (.91 dB improvement) tests but not for Size III SITA or Size V (p<.001; Figure). The average learning effect between visits was only .09 dB for Size III SITA and .04 dB for Size V; whereas, for MP, the average learning effect was .38 dB and .23 for Matrix. Additionally, the largest learning effects in MP and Matrix were observed between visits 1 and 2: .86 dB improvement for MP and .42 for Matrix.

 
Conclusions:
 

Learning effects may be minimal in glaucoma patients when they are administered multiple perimetric tests. There may be a transfer of learning effects among similar perimetric tests.  

 
Keywords: perimetry • visual fields 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×