May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Comparison of the Anterior and Posterior Corneal Elevation Maps in Normal and Keratoconus-Suspect Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Z. Schlegel
    Ophtalmology, Rothschild Foundation and Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France
  • T. Hoang-Xuan
    Ophtalmology, Rothschild Foundation and Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France
  • D. Gatinel
    Ophtalmology, Rothschild Foundation and Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Z. Schlegel, None; T. Hoang-Xuan, None; D. Gatinel, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 1842. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Z. Schlegel, T. Hoang-Xuan, D. Gatinel; Comparison of the Anterior and Posterior Corneal Elevation Maps in Normal and Keratoconus-Suspect Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):1842. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To compare the anterior and posterior corneal elevation maps between keratoconus-suspects (KS) and normal eyes.

Methods:: We retrospectively analysed the corneal elevation of anterior and posterior corneal surface in a population of normal myopic patients (60 eyes of 30 subjects) and patients with suspicion of fruste keratoconus (40 eyes of 22 subjects). The following parameters were analysed and compared for the eyes of each group: anterior and posterior best-fit sphere (BFS) radius, central and thinnest corneal pachymetry, anterior and posterior aconic shape factors (aconic radius, aconic asphericity and aconic toricity), and anterior and posterior elevation in 1 mm of radius zone. For each eye, the correlations between elevation parameters of its anterior and posterior corneal surfaces were investigated.

Results:: The mean central and thinnest pachymetry values were thinner in the KS eyes (494 µm vs 554 µm: p<0.0001). When comparing the anterior elevation maps, the only difference between the analysed groups was anterior toricity which was greater in KS than normal eyes (0.939 D vs 1.328 D: p<0.0001). When comparing the posterior elevation maps, KS eyes showed increased posterior toricity (2.021 D vs 1.478 D: p = 0.018), more negative asphericity (Q = -0.419 vs Q’ = -0.297: p = 0.042) and higher posterior elevation (0.029 µm vs 0.022 µm: p = 0.006). There was less correlation between the anterior and posterior surfaces in KS than in normal eyes for the asphericity and elevation above the BFS and aconic radius.

Conclusions:: Corneal elevation topography is a sensitive method to identify patients who are potentially at high risk for developing ectasia after LASIK. The posterior corneal elevation map combined with corneal thickness values appear to be an important indicator of possible mild to suspect form of keratoconus.

Keywords: keratoconus • refractive surgery: corneal topography • anterior segment 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×