May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Biomechanical Measurements in Corneal Ectatic Disorders
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • N. Bourla
    JSEI, UCLA, Cornea Division, California
  • N. Lee
    Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • D. R. Hamilton
    JSEI, UCLA, Laser Refractive Center, California
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships N. Bourla, None; N. Lee, None; D.R. Hamilton, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 1850. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      N. Bourla, N. Lee, D. R. Hamilton; Biomechanical Measurements in Corneal Ectatic Disorders. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):1850.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose:: Patients with corneal ectatic disorders possess impaired corneal biomechanics. The Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert) measures the biomechanical metrics corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF). This study compares CH and CRF measurements in ectatic corneas (e.g. keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, post-LASIK ectasia) with normal corneas.

Methods:: CH and CRF were measured for 141 eyes in two groups. Group 1 consists of 97 eyes defined as normal based on clinical and topographic findings. Group 2 consists of 44 eyes defined as ectatic based on clinical and topographic findings (26 eyes with keratoconus, 8 eyes with pellucid marginal degeneration, and 10 eyes with post-LASIK ectasia). Statistical analysis was performed to examine differences between groups.

Results:: Both CH and CRF measurements were significantly lower in eyes with ectatic disorders (7.09+1.65, 7.61+1.24, respectively) compared with normal eyes (11.25+1.56 and 11.52+1.66 respectively, P < 0.001). No significant difference in CH and CRF values was found between the keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration and post-LASIK ectasia eyes.

Conclusions:: The CH and CRF measurements in eyes with corneal ectatic disorders are significantly lower when compared to eyes with normal corneas. The biomechanical metrics CH and CRF may assist with the identification of abnormal corneas and allow for quantification of biomechanical differences between normal and ectactic corneas.

Keywords: refractive surgery: other technologies • keratoconus • cornea: clinical science 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.