May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Agreement for Detecting Change Using HRT Topographic Change Analysis (TCA), Standard Automated Perimetry Glaucoma Progression Analysis (GPA) and Stereo-Photograph Assessment
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C. Bowd
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Dept. of Ophthalmology, Univ of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • M. Balasubramanian
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Dept. of Ophthalmology, Univ of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • F. A. Medeiros
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Dept. of Ophthalmology, Univ of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • L. M. Alencar
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Dept. of Ophthalmology, Univ of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • L. M. Zangwill
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Dept. of Ophthalmology, Univ of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • P. A. Sample
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Dept. of Ophthalmology, Univ of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • C. Vasile
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Dept. of Ophthalmology, Univ of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • R. R. Bourne
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Dept. of Ophthalmology, Univ of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • R. N. Weinreb
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Dept. of Ophthalmology, Univ of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships C. Bowd, None; M. Balasubramanian, Heidelberg Engineering, F; F.A. Medeiros, Heidelberg Engineering, F; Carl Zeiss Meditec, F; Heidelberg Engineering, R; Carl Zeiss Meditec, R; L.M. Alencar, None; L.M. Zangwill, Heidelberg Engineering, F; Carl Zeiss Meditec, F; P.A. Sample, Carl Zeiss Meditec, F; Haag-Streit, F; Welch-Allen, F; C. Vasile, None; R.R. Bourne, None; R.N. Weinreb, Heidelberg Engineering, F; Carl Zeiss Meditec, F; Heidelberg Engineering, R; Carl Zeiss Meditec, R.
  • Footnotes
    Support NEI EY08208, NEI EY11008, Participant retention incentive grants in the form of glaucoma medication at no cost (Alcon Laboratories Inc., Allergan, Pfizer Inc., SANTEN Inc.)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 1973. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C. Bowd, M. Balasubramanian, F. A. Medeiros, L. M. Alencar, L. M. Zangwill, P. A. Sample, C. Vasile, R. R. Bourne, R. N. Weinreb; Agreement for Detecting Change Using HRT Topographic Change Analysis (TCA), Standard Automated Perimetry Glaucoma Progression Analysis (GPA) and Stereo-Photograph Assessment. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):1973.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: Recent advances in HRT software (version 3.0) include improved image registration that likely reduces baseline variability used to define change in the HRT TCA. This reduction in variability should increase sensitivity to detect significant change in follow-up visits. The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement between change detected using HRT TCA, standard automated perimetry (SAP) GPA and assessment of stereo-photographs.

Methods:: 163 eyes with ≥ 4 HRT examinations, ≥ 2 years HRT follow-up with SAP testing and stereo-photography within one year of first HRT exam were selected from the UCSD Hamilton Glaucoma Center Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) database. TCA analysis was conducted using all available images of acceptable quality from each eye. Significant change was defined as a ≥ 20 mega-pixel and/or ≥ 2% of disc area contiguous, significant, reduction in retinal height within the optic disc margin on ≥ 3 consecutive exams. GPA was performed on all eyes using the 2 visual fields (VFs) closest to the first HRT exam as baseline, and all available reliable subsequent VFs as follow-up. Significant change was defined based on Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial criterion of ≥ 3 changed (p<5%) test points repeatable on ≥ 3 consecutive tests. Stereo-photograph change was based on differences detected when comparing the photograph closest to the first HRT exam with the most recent photograph in a masked fashion (2 observers, 1 adjudicator).

Results:: HRT TCA detected change in 21/31 (68%) eyes that showed change by either SAP GPA (11/16), stereo-photograph assessment (20/23) or both (5/8). In addition, HRT detected change in 55/132 (42%) eyes that showed no change with either other technique. In most cases of agreed change between TCA and GPA, location of change (superior versus inferior hemi-retina/hemi-field) corresponded (10/11).

Conclusions:: HRT TCA detects more change over time than GPA or stereo-photograph assessment. These results might suggest increased sensitivity compared to SAP GPA and stereo-photograph assessment, however, increased follow-up with VFs and stereo-photography is necessary for confirmation. Poor agreement between TCA change detection and change detection using VFs and/or stereo-photography (overall agreement in 98/163 eyes, Kappa = 0.17) suggests that these techniques likely cannot be used interchangeably for glaucoma monitoring.

Keywords: imaging/image analysis: clinical • optic disc • imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×