May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
25-Gauge and 20-GaugeVitrectomy Surgery: Outcomes and Complications, a Comparison
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • L. J. Faia
    Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • C. A. McCannel
    Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • J. S. Pulido
    Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • R. M. Hatfield
    Ophthalmology, Retina Consultants Inc, Charleston, West Virginia
  • M. E. Hatfield
    Ophthalmology, Retina Consultants Inc, Charleston, West Virginia
  • V. E. W. McNulty
    Ophthalmology, Retina Consultants Inc, Charleston, West Virginia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships L.J. Faia, None; C.A. McCannel, None; J.S. Pulido, None; R.M. Hatfield, None; M.E. Hatfield, None; V.E.W. McNulty, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY and Mayo Foundation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 2208. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      L. J. Faia, C. A. McCannel, J. S. Pulido, R. M. Hatfield, M. E. Hatfield, V. E. W. McNulty; 25-Gauge and 20-GaugeVitrectomy Surgery: Outcomes and Complications, a Comparison. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):2208.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To assess and compare outcomes of 25-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomy surgeries, including visual recovery, rate of cataract formation, and complications.

Methods:: A retrospective, case-control study was performed comparing 25-gauge vitrectomies (between January 2002 and August 2004) to 20-gauge vitrectomies (between January 2003 and December 2003). Cases with prior vitrectomies by either method, diagnoses not seen as primary diagnoses for the 25-gauge vitrectomies, or cases without at least 3 months of follow-up were excluded from analysis. Analyses were performed with the Fisher’s exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and Kaplan-Meier.

Results:: Inclusion criteria were met by 71 and 68 cases of 25-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomies, respectively. The mean visual acuity at the 3-month post-operative visit improved significantly from the mean pre-operative visual acuity for both groups (p<0.001 for 25-gauge and p=0.002 for 20-gauge). At the 3-month post-operative visit, the visual acuity was significantly better for those eyes which underwent a 25-gauge vitrectomy (p=0.013), though there was no difference at the final visit. The rate of cataract extraction at one year was 63.4% for the 25-gauge group and 68% for the 20-gauge group by Kaplan-Meier analysis (p=0.700). Regardless of vitrectomy technique, pseudophakic patients for the epiretinal membrane (ERM) and macular hole (MH) groups at the last post-operative visit had visual acuities that were better than those who were still phakic (ERM p=0.01; MH p=0.005). Low intraocular pressures (<6 mmHg) on post-operative day one were more commonly noted in the 25-gauge group (p=0.028), while high intraocular pressures (>21 mmHg) were found more often in the 20-gauge group (p=0.004). Retinal tears were seen in 1 and 12 cases of 25-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomies, respectively.

Conclusions:: Twenty-five gauge vitrectomies appear to provide faster visual acuity recovery, though the final visual acuity outcomes are similar. Complication profiles between the two groups differ when evaluating intraocular pressure on post-operative day one and incidences of retinal tears. The rate of cataract formation after 25-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomies do not differ.

Keywords: vitreoretinal surgery • cataract • visual acuity 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×