May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
The Effect of Cyclotorsion and Pupil Centroid Shift on Excimer Laser Photoablation: Analysis of 1000 Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R. Solomon
    Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Rockville Centre, New York
  • E. Donnenfeld
    Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Rockville Centre, New York
  • A. Nattis
    Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Rockville Centre, New York
  • G. Fishman
    Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Rockville Centre, New York
  • J. Roth
    TLC Laser Eye Center, Garden City, New York
  • J. Stein
    Ophthalmic Consultants of Connecticut, Fairfield, Connecticut
  • M. McDonald
    Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Lynbrook, New York
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships R. Solomon, None; E. Donnenfeld, Alcon, AMO, Bausch and Lomb, C; A. Nattis, None; G. Fishman, None; J. Roth, None; J. Stein, None; M. McDonald, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 2362. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R. Solomon, E. Donnenfeld, A. Nattis, G. Fishman, J. Roth, J. Stein, M. McDonald; The Effect of Cyclotorsion and Pupil Centroid Shift on Excimer Laser Photoablation: Analysis of 1000 Patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):2362.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To evaluate the magnitude and importance of cyclotorsional registration and pupil centroid shift compensation on excimer laser photoablation.

Methods:: Cyclotorsion, pupil centroid shift, and pupil size changes were measured in 1193 consecutive eyes undergoing LASIK with the VISX S4 IR between their wavefront capture and at the time of surgery. The LASIK flaps were created with the Amadeus II microkeratome or the IntraLase femtosecond laser and the data were retrospectively gathered from a chart review.

Results:: Iris registration was achieved in 93% (83/1193) of eyes. There was no statistical difference between registration achieved with the Amadeus II microkeratome 94.6% (581/614) and the IntraLase femtosecond laser 91.4 % (529/579). Mean cyclotorsion between wavefront capture and ablation was 3.21 +/- 2.1 degrees with a range of 0-9.7 degrees. Mean X and Y axis pupil centroid shift was 0.26 +/- .13 and 0.13 +/- .08 microns with a range of 0-0.5 microns. Mean wavefront pupil size was 6.63 +/- .86 mm and mean treatment pupil size under minimal illumination was 3.56 +/- .66 mm.

Conclusions:: Wavefront data must be centered on a fixed eye structure rather than the pupil center and cyclotorsion must be accounted for to ensure that wavefront data captured is appropriately matched to the pupil at the time of surgery. Otherwise, clinically significant decentration of the wavefront between capture and excimer laser application is possible.

Keywords: refractive surgery: LASIK • refractive surgery: other technologies • laser 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×