May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Electrode Impedance Can Be a Reliable Measurement of Retinal-Electrode Proximity During Epiretinal Electrical Stimulation in Rats
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • B. B. Thomas
    Ophthalmology Vis Sci-USC, Doheny Retina Institute, Los Angeles, California
  • A. Ray
    Biomedical Engineering-USC, Viterbi School of Engineering, Los Angeles, California
  • L. L. Chan
    Biomedical Engineering-USC, Viterbi School of Engineering, Los Angeles, California
  • M. S. Humayun
    Ophthalmology Vis Sci-USC, Doheny Retina Institute, Los Angeles, California
  • J. D. Weiland
    Ophthalmology Vis Sci-USC, Doheny Retina Institute, Los Angeles, California
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships B.B. Thomas, None; A. Ray, None; L.L. Chan, None; M.S. Humayun, Second Sight Medical Products, Inc., I; J.D. Weiland, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support Department of Energy Biological Sciences Division, NSF EEC-0310723, NEI EY03040, Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 2551. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      B. B. Thomas, A. Ray, L. L. Chan, M. S. Humayun, J. D. Weiland; Electrode Impedance Can Be a Reliable Measurement of Retinal-Electrode Proximity During Epiretinal Electrical Stimulation in Rats. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):2551.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To investigate electrical impedance as a tool to assess the electrode-retina proximity during epiretinal electrical stimulation in rats.

Methods:: A platinum-iridium stimulating electrode (75 µm diameter hemisphere) was advanced under control of a micromanipulator through the vitreous of the rat eye (n=4) while visualized through a surgical microscope. The impedance of the electrode was measured at various depths inside the vitreous and after the electrode visibly reaches close proximity with the epiretinal surface. The impedance was measured using a 20 mV, 100 kHz sine wave. Biphasic current pulses (1ms/phase, cathodic first, 1.0-200 µA) were delivered and responses were recorded from the superior colliculus (SC). The return electrode for impedance testing was a large needle electrode inserted under the skin over the nostril and the concentric bipolar electrode was used for current pulsing.

Results:: When the electrode tip was inside the vitreous but distant from the retina, the impedance was 8.11±0.39 kΩ. The electrode was advanced in 10-50 um steps. When the electrode was visibly near the retina, but before the electrode visibly deformed the retina (no direct contact), the impedance rapidly increased (13.41±0.61 kΩ, p<0.006, paired t-test). At high impedance location, the threshold value for SC evoked responses were lower (2.0-50 uA) compared to the low impedance location where threshold value for SC responses was greater than 70 uA

Conclusions:: In the rat retina, considerable increase in the electrode impedance level could be measured after an apparent proximity was established with the epiretinal surface during which the threshold value for SC evoked responses were minimum. This suggests that the electrode impedance measurement can be a reliable tool to optimize the retinal-electrode contact during epiretinal electrical stimulation

Keywords: retina • superior colliculus/optic tectum • electrophysiology: non-clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×