May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Comparison of One-Photon and Two-Photon Excited Autofluorescence of RPE Cells From Human Donor Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • O. La Schiazza
    Kirchhoff Institute for Physics, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • M. Agopov
    Kirchhoff Institute for Physics, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • M. Han
    Kirchhoff Institute for Physics, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • J. Bille
    Kirchhoff Institute for Physics, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships O. La Schiazza, None; M. Agopov, None; M. Han, None; J. Bille, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 2589. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      O. La Schiazza, M. Agopov, M. Han, J. Bille; Comparison of One-Photon and Two-Photon Excited Autofluorescence of RPE Cells From Human Donor Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):2589.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: Two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) on RPE cells offers a number of advantages compared to one-photon excited fluorescence in the human eye, e.g. large sensing depth, minimized photo damage and sub-micron resolution. The present study compares blue excited one-photon and red excited two-photon autofluorescence of RPE cells from human donor eyes in terms of resolution, sensitivity and emitted spectrum.

Methods:: A DPSS 488 nm (Kyma, Melles Griot) cw- resp. Ti:Sapphire (780 nm, 150 fs, 76 MHz) (Mira 900F, Coherent) fs-laser was coupled to a conventional laser scanning ophthalmoscope (HRT, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). RPE samples from human donor eyes were imaged with both lasers used as excitation source. The one-photon detection channel used a confocal pinhole in front of the photodiode, wereas in the two-photon detection channel intrinsic depth discrimination was achieved without the confocal pinhole. Autofluorescence and reflection were in both cases separated using dichroic beamsplitters combined with appropriate shortpass filters. The spectrum of the autofluorescence was measured using a VIS-NIR spectrometer from OceanOptics.

Results:: Resolution and Sensitivity of TPE autofluorescence on RPE samples were comparable to single photon excitated fluorescence, with the advantages of larger sensing depth, minimized photo damage and intrinsic 3D resolution. The autofluorescence spectrum of the blue excited RPE cells ranged from 500-740 nm, with a emission peak at 560 nm.

Conclusions:: Two photon retinal imaging allows to study a broad range of pathological and morphological defects in the retina with higher resolution and less photo- and thermal damage out of focus compared to a single photon blue light excitation and has the potential to find a main pillar in clinical ophthalmological applications with the possibility to take this method through to patients with retinal disease, e.g. AMD.

Keywords: age-related macular degeneration • retinal pigment epithelium • imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×