May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Ocular Coherence Tomography ( OCT ) Macular Thickness in Normal Subjects: A Comparative Study Between Radial Lines and Fast Macular Protocols
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. Gelmini, Jr.
    Retina, Hospital Oftalmologico de Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil
  • A. U. Vargas
    Retina, Hospital Oftalmologico de Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil
  • L. T. Okimoto
    Retina, Hospital Oftalmologico de Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil
  • L. T. Dalfre
    Retina, Hospital Oftalmologico de Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil
  • R. Braga
    Retina, Hospital Oftalmologico de Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil
  • A. F. Bordon
    Retina, Hospital Oftalmologico de Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships A. Gelmini, None; A.U. Vargas, None; L.T. Okimoto, None; L.T. Dalfre, None; R. Braga, None; A.F. Bordon, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 2598. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. Gelmini, Jr., A. U. Vargas, L. T. Okimoto, L. T. Dalfre, R. Braga, A. F. Bordon; Ocular Coherence Tomography ( OCT ) Macular Thickness in Normal Subjects: A Comparative Study Between Radial Lines and Fast Macular Protocols. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):2598.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To compare OCT measurements of the foveal and perifoveal thickness obtained by fast macular and radial lines protocols in normal eyes.

Methods:: Normal eyes with refraction errors between +4.00 and -6.00 were submitted to OCT Stratus examination through undilated pupils. Fast macular thickness and radial lines protocols were used. Thickness measurements were done using OCT automated toll. Foveal and perifoveal temporal, nasal, superior, and inferior thickness were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the student-t test, and p <0,05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:: One hundred eyes of 100 patients were evaluated. Mean age was 34.1 years. Mean thickness for fast macular and radial lines were respectively: foveal: 204.1µ and 201.2 µ (p=0.00016); perifoveal superior: 281.6 µ and 282.0 µ (p=0.36); perifoveal temporal: 267.4 µ and 267.8 µ (p=0.59); perifoveal inferior: 282.0 µ and 282.0 µ (p=0.96); perifoveal nasal: 281.2 µ and 282.5 µ (p=0.18).

Conclusions:: Foveal thickness measured by the fast macular protocol was statistically significant higher than measured by the radial lines protocol. The other perifoveal measurements were statistically significant equivalent.

Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • imaging/image analysis: clinical • macula/fovea 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×