May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Variability of Control in Intermittent Exotropia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. R. Hatt
    Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
  • D. A. Leske
    Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
  • B. G. Mohney
    Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
  • J. M. Holmes
    Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships S.R. Hatt, None; D.A. Leske, None; B.G. Mohney, None; J.M. Holmes, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support NIH Grant EY015799 (JMH) and Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 2842. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. R. Hatt, D. A. Leske, B. G. Mohney, J. M. Holmes; Variability of Control in Intermittent Exotropia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):2842.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: Control of intermittent exotropia (IXT) may be defined as the proportion of time the deviation is manifest and the ease of re-establishing fusion after dissociation. Control scales allow control to be quantified but it is unclear whether a single measure adequately represents an individual patient. Using an established Clinic Control Scale rating phoria from 0 to 2 and tropia from 3 to 5 (Mohney and Holmes, Strabismus 2006;14:147-150), we evaluated agreement between 2 examiners and assessed minute to minute variability of the condition.

Methods:: Distance and near control were independently assessed by 2 examiners in 17 patients with IXT (median age 8 years; range 2 to 33 years). Examiner 1 assessed control for each patient and was observed simultaneously by examiner 2 (time point 1). Within 2-5 minutes examiner 2 assessed control and was observed simultaneously by examiner 1 (time point 2). This yielded a total of 68 simultaneous assessments, 34 at time point 1 (17 near and 17 distance) and 34 at time point 2 (17 near and 17 distance). Agreement between examiners was analyzed using the Kappa test. The threshold for defining change in control between time points 1 and 2 was defined as the maximum difference in control scores between examiners. The frequency and severity of change between time points 1 and 2 was then analyzed.

Results:: There was almost perfect agreement between examiners for near (k=0.95) and for distance fixation (k=0.94). Disagreements occurred in only 5 (7%) of 68 assessments and differed no more than one level. There were no instances when one examiner recorded a phoria (0-2 on scale) while the other recorded a tropia (3-5 on scale). Four (23%) of 17 patients showed a change of >1 level between time points 1 and 2: 1 (6%) of 17 changed from tropia to phoria for distance, 3 (18%) of 17 changed from phoria to tropia for near.

Conclusions:: The Clinic Control Scale has a high level of inter-observer agreement and therefore provides a reliable measure of control at a given time point. Nevertheless, in approximately a quarter of patients, control of IXT varied within minutes from phoric to spontaneously tropic and vice versa, suggesting that a measure of control at a single time point may be insufficient to categorize severity in an individual patient.

Keywords: esotropia and exotropia • strabismus 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×