May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Combination Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5mg and Verteporfin PDT versus Verteporfin PDT Alone in the FOCUS Study of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • P. Lanzetta
    Dept of Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
  • FOCUS Study Group
    Dept of Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships P. Lanzetta, Novartis Phama AG, R.
  • Footnotes
    Support Novartis Pharma AG
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 2869. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      P. Lanzetta, FOCUS Study Group; Combination Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5mg and Verteporfin PDT versus Verteporfin PDT Alone in the FOCUS Study of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):2869.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: The FOCUS study compared the safety and efficacy of monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab combined with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin PDT alone in patients with subfoveal, predominantly classic CNV secondary to AMD.

Methods:: In this Phase I/II, multicenter, randomized, single-masked, controlled study, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either monthly ranibizumab 0.5mg (n=106) or sham (n=56). Verteporfin PDT was initially performed 7 days before ranibizumab or sham and then every 3 months as needed in both arms.

Results:: At 24 months, 87.5% of combination-treated patients had lost <15 letters, compared to 75% of the PDT-only arm (p=0.04). Mean VA had improved in the combination-treated group by 4.6 letters over baseline, compared to a loss of 7.8 letters in the PDT-only group (p<0.0001). The VA benefit was seen as early as 7 days and was maintained throughout the study. In addition, 24.8% of combination-treated patients improved mean VA by >15 letters, compared to 7.1% in the control group (p=0.006), and only 30.5% of patients progressed to 20/200 vision with combination, compared to 50% with PDT alone (p=0.006). On average, after the initial verteporfin PDT, a mean 0.4 additional verteporfin treatments were required in the combination group, compared to an additional 3.0 verteporfin treatments in the PDT-only group. The higher incidence of intraocular inflammation identified at 12 months was significantly reduced following a protocol amendment changing ranibizumab from a lyophilized to the liquid formulation (LucentisTM), and increasing the interval between the two treatments in the combination arm to 28 days.

Conclusions:: At 24 months, combination therapy reduced vision loss of >15 letters compared to verteporfin PDT alone, increased mean VA over baseline, reduced progression to 20/200 and the need for PDT retreatment. The change from the lyophilized to the liquid formulation of ranibizumab and increased interval between treatments resulted in significant reduction of intraocular inflammation.

Clinical Trial:: www.clinicaltrials.gov nct0056823

Keywords: age-related macular degeneration • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: treatment/prevention assessment/controlled clinical trials • photodynamic therapy 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×