May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
The Effects of Optic Nerve Head Drusen on the Latency of the Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • T. M. Grippo
    Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, NY, New York
    Beth Israel Medical Center, Ny, New York
  • D. C. Hood
    Columbia University, NY, New York
  • F. N. Kanadani
    Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, NY, New York
  • I. Ezon
    Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, NY, New York
  • B. Wangsupadilok
    Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, NY, New York
  • C. Tello
    Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, NY, New York
  • J. M. Liebmann
    Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, NY, New York
    Manhattan Eye Ear & Throat Hospital, Ny, New York
  • R. Ritch
    Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, NY, New York
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships T.M. Grippo, None; D.C. Hood, None; F.N. Kanadani, None; I. Ezon, None; B. Wangsupadilok, None; C. Tello, None; J.M. Liebmann, None; R. Ritch, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support Norman and Sandra Pessin Research Fund of the New York Glaucoma Research Institute, New York, NY and Grant NIH RO1-EY02115
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 3174. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      T. M. Grippo, D. C. Hood, F. N. Kanadani, I. Ezon, B. Wangsupadilok, C. Tello, J. M. Liebmann, R. Ritch; The Effects of Optic Nerve Head Drusen on the Latency of the Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):3174.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To determine the effect of optic nerve head drusen (ONHD) on the latency of the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) and to better understand the pathophysiology of this condition.

Methods:: Monocular mfVEPs were recorded from a group of 10 patients (18 eyes) with ONHD, 18 patients (26 eyes) with high tension glaucoma (HTG), 19 patients (31 eyes) with low tension glaucoma (LTG) and a control group of 19 subjects (38 eyes). Mean age was 62.0 ± 11 (LTG); 62.0 ± 10.8 (HTG); 59.7 ± 9.3 (ONHD) and 53.0 ± 9.5 (controls) years. Average mean deviation (MD) was - 6.4 ± 5 (LTG); - 6.2 ± 4.3 (HTG) - 5.2 ± 7.0 (ONHD) and - 0.5 ± 0.9 (controls) dB. Mean recorded maximum intraocular pressure (IOP) was 17.2 ± 4.9 (LTG); 26.3 ± 5.5 (HTG); 15 ± 3.7 (ONHD) and 14 ± 3.5 (controls) mmHg. Glaucoma eyes were defined by the presence of a glaucomatous disc and an abnormal 24-2 visual field as described previously [1] and were characterized as LTG or HTG based on IOP. The mfVEPs were elicited by a 60-sector dartboard display. The mfVEPs monocular latencies were measured using custom software [2] and analyzed in two ways: 1) average relative latency (i.e. the latency relative to a normative group [3]) of all individual mfVEPs for an eye, and 2) percent of the 60-sectors with significantly delayed latencies.

Results:: For 50% (9/18) of the ONHD eyes, mfVEP latency values fell above the 95% limits for the controls, while for 39% (7/18) of the ONHD eyes, the percent of delayed sectors fell above the 95% limit. All patient groups showed an increase in mfVEP latency with average relative latencies, and percent of sectors delayed, of 4.5 ms & 15% (ONHD), 2.8 ms & 9.3% (LTG) and 5.5 ms & 20.9% (HTG) compared to 1 ms and 4.9% (controls). When one eye (the eye with the worse MD on perimetry) of each subject was analyzed, the difference between ONHD (4.5 ms; 15.6%), HTG (5 ms; 20.5%) and controls (1 ms; 4.5%) was significant (Wilcoxon test; p < 0.05).

Conclusions:: ONHD causes an optic neuropathy that produces significant latency delays on the mfVEP. These delays are greater than those seen in LTG and ischemic optic neuropathy [4], similar to those for HTG, where mechanical compression may play an important role, and below those seen in compressive optic neuropathy [5] were mechanical compression is involved. Mechanical compression may contribute to visual field loss in patients with ONHD. 1. Grippo et al IOVS (2006); 2. Hood et al Doc. Ophthal. (2004); 3. Fortune et al Doc. Ophthal. (2004); 4. Odel et al ARVO 2005; 5. Semela et al BJO (2006).

Keywords: electrophysiology: clinical • neuro-ophthalmology: optic nerve 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×