May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Comparison of the Measurement of Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Two Different Non-Contact Specular Microscopes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. Schnaidt
    Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
  • A. Osvald
    Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
  • F. Schirra
    Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
  • L. Troeber
    Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
  • U. Löw
    Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
  • C. Jonescu-Cuypers
    Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
    Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • B. Seitz
    Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships A. Schnaidt, None; A. Osvald, None; F. Schirra, None; L. Troeber, None; U. Löw, None; C. Jonescu-Cuypers, None; B. Seitz, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 3870. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. Schnaidt, A. Osvald, F. Schirra, L. Troeber, U. Löw, C. Jonescu-Cuypers, B. Seitz; Comparison of the Measurement of Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Two Different Non-Contact Specular Microscopes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):3870.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: The purpose of the study was to evaluate differences between endothelial cell counts by means of the semi-automatic SP-2000P Specular Microscope (SM) (Topcon/Japan) and the novel video-based Sea Eagle System (SES) (Rhine-Tec/Germany). Determination of endothelial cell density is crucial for diagnosis in corneal disorders, especially before and after corneal surgery (e.g. keratoplasty).

Methods:: Measurements were performed on 100 corneas of 50 patients with corneal diseases. An image was acquired with both devices and the number of cells was subsequently calculated. The SM performs a semi-automatic cell count measurement, whereas the SES cell detection runs automatically. Measurement data was compared and statistically evaluated.

Results:: Mean age of patients was 59.8 years (SD 11.2). Mean cell count for the right eyes was 2192.9 cells/mm² (SD 576.5) for SM and 2163.3 cells/mm² (SD 534.0) for SES respectively. Left eyes` cell count was 2340.6 cells/mm² (SD 519.6) for SM and 2316.6 cells/mm² (SD 474.5) for SES respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between both devices (p=0.32 and p=0.3). Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.843 for the right eyes and 0.901 for the left eyes, respectively.

Conclusions:: Both specular microscopic devices for endothelial cell count are comparable for clinical use in terms of precision. However, with the SES direct on-screen comparison with previous measurements is possible and therefore more applicable for routine follow-up.

Keywords: cornea: endothelium • imaging/image analysis: clinical • microscopy: light/fluorescence/immunohistochemistry 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×