May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Determining Success of Macular Hole Surgery by OCT Maximum Linear Hole Diameter
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. M. Wren
    Ophthalmology, Moorfields St George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • S. Shah
    Ophthalmology, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
  • A. Kumar
    Ophthalmology, Liverpool Royal Infirmary, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • L. Membrey
    Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • A. Laidlaw
    Ophthalmology, St Thomas's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships S.M. Wren, None; S. Shah, None; A. Kumar, None; L. Membrey, None; A. Laidlaw, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 4120. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. M. Wren, S. Shah, A. Kumar, L. Membrey, A. Laidlaw; Determining Success of Macular Hole Surgery by OCT Maximum Linear Hole Diameter. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):4120.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: Several factors including age and stage of hole, inner limiting membrane peeling, and posturing are thought to predict the outcome of macular hole surgery, there is however no single reliable prognostic factor to refer to when advising patients about the potential success of surgery on their eye. The OCT maximum linear hole diameter has recently been suggested to predict the outcome of surgery and is a simple and repeatable measurement to perform. This study aimed to investigate its reliability.

Methods:: In a prospective study of 67 consecutive patients undergoing macular hole surgery with simultaneous phacoemulsification IOL (if phakic) ICG assisted ILM peeling, C3F8 and no post-operative posturing were studied. OCT maximum linear hole diameter was measured pre-operatively as were the other recognised demographic and ocular potential predictors.

Results:: The overall success of closure was 84%. Using a multivariate analysis, maximum linear hole diameter was the potential predictor most strongly associated with surgical outcome. These data were used in a logistic equation to determine chances of surgical success. The model showed a closure rate of 99% for holes of 200µm, 97% for holes of 300µm, 92% for 400µm 81% for 500µm and 615 for 600µm. There was a strong correlation of the macular hole diameter to the success of surgery, measured by the anatomical closure (p=0.002). This model was then tested for its reliability using a Hosmer-Lemeshow Test, which demonstrated a goodness of fit. (Sensitivity 98.2% and specificity 36.3%).

Conclusions:: The model needs further refinement. Measurement of OCT maximum linear hole diameter may prove to be our most valuable tool when counselling patients and comparing surgical techniques for macular hole surgery.

Keywords: macular holes • imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×