May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
The Ganglion Cell Component of the I-Wave in the Photopic ERG
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Mizunoya
    Ophthalmology, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Ichihara, Japan
  • T. Sugawara
    Ophthalmology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana, Japan
  • J. Uehara
    Ophthalmology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana, Japan
  • K. Ogata
    Ophthalmology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana, Japan
  • S. Yamamoto
    Ophthalmology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships S. Mizunoya, None; T. Sugawara, None; J. Uehara, None; K. Ogata, None; S. Yamamoto, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 4182. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Mizunoya, T. Sugawara, J. Uehara, K. Ogata, S. Yamamoto; The Ganglion Cell Component of the I-Wave in the Photopic ERG. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):4182.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: The i-wave component (Nagata, 1963) of the photopic electroretinogram (ERG) was reportedly derived from near ganglion cell (GC) layer in human (Lachapelle, et al, 1990 and 1996). To investigate GC component of the i-wave, photopic ERGs were recorded in patients with unilateral chronic optic nerve disease in this study.

Methods:: After adequate informed consent was obtained, five patients with unilateral optic disc atrophy were examined. Patients’ age ranged 27- 63 (mean: 42.3) years old. After 10 min light adaptation, photopic ERGs were recorded using LED contact lens electrodes and LE2000 system (TOMEY). The photopic b-wave, i-wave, photopic negative response (PhNR) were analyzed and compared with those from five age-similar normal controls.

Results:: Results were showed below. Numbers indicate mean values. The AE and FE mean affected and fellow eye, respectively. The RE and LE mean right and left control eye, respectively. The PhNR (µV) were 20.4*(AE), 42.2 *(FE), 43.7(RE), 45.0(LE). The i-wave (ms) were 49.0(AE), 48.2(FE), 47.4(RE), 47.5(LE). The i-wave (µV) were 30.5(AE), 35.8(FE), 45.9(RE), 47.0(LE). The b-wave (µV) were 160.5(AE), 170.2(FE), 205.2(RE), 210.1(LE). The i/b ratio were 0.19(AE), 0.21(FE), 0.22(RE), 0.22(LE). The i/b(AE)/ i/b(FE) were 0.90* (AE/FE), 1.00* (RE/LE). Statistical analyses were performed using paired-t test (*p<0.05).

Conclusions:: There was no statistical difference in both i-wave implicit time and i-wave amplitude, thus, i-wave may not be a good indicator for the GC function. The AE/FE ratio of the i/b ratio was related to GC component because of their variation depending on subject, but the PhNR was better indicator for GC function in the LE 2000. Therefore, the origin of the i-wave should be not only near GC but also surrounding of the GC.

Keywords: ganglion cells • electrophysiology: clinical • optic nerve 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×