May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Non-Compliance, the Blind Spot in Glaucoma Treatment: Results From the Belgian Compliance Study in Ophthalmology
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Vandenbroeck
    Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium
  • F. Dobbels
    Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium
  • I. Stalmans
    Ophthalmology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Belgium
  • S. De Geest
    Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium
    Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Switzerland
  • T. G. Zeyen
    Ophthalmology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Belgium
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships S. Vandenbroeck, None; F. Dobbels, None; I. Stalmans, None; S. De Geest, None; T.G. Zeyen, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support Phizer Grant
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 4335. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Vandenbroeck, F. Dobbels, I. Stalmans, S. De Geest, T. G. Zeyen; Non-Compliance, the Blind Spot in Glaucoma Treatment: Results From the Belgian Compliance Study in Ophthalmology. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):4335.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: Favorable outcomes of glaucoma are largely dependent on the patient’s ability to comply with prescribed eye drop treatment. Yet, compliance studies are usually single-center studies, including a small number of patients. The goal of the multi-center Belgian Compliance Study in Ophthalmology (BSCO) was to substantiate the magnitude of non-compliance (NC) with eye drop treatment in a large sample of glaucoma patients and to determine a possible association between NC and selected demographic & treatment characteristics.

Methods:: A cross-sectional survey was performed in 876 glaucoma patients treated in 60 different ophthalmologic centers in Belgium. NC with eye drop treatment was assessed anonymously using a written self-report questionnaire developed for the purpose of this study. More specifically, patients were asked how many times they had forgotten to administer eye drops during the past 2 weeks. Patients had 4 answer options: never, seldom, once a week or daily. Two definitions of NC were explored: (1) missing one or more doses; (2) missing two or more doses in the past 2 weeks.

Results:: 731 out of 876 (83.5%) questionnaires were available for data analyses. 39.7% and 12.3% of the patients admitted not being compliant to their treatment regimen in the last 2 weeks for resp. chosen definitions. Correlates of NC were robust as similar correlates were found for the 2 definitions. Significantly more male patients ((1) Χ2=10.46; p=0.001; (2) Χ2=9.15; p=0.002) and younger patients ((1) Mann-Whitney U= 54296; p<0.001; (2) Mann-Whitney U= 25669; p=0.073) were NC. Moreover, a higher number of daily doses was also positively associated with NC ((1) Mann-Whitney U=56580; p=0.013; (2) Mann-Whitney-U=22386; p<0.001). Within the group of NC patients, the evening doses were mentioned to be most frequently missed in 59.6% (1) and 56.7% (2) of the patients respectively. 47% (1) and 31.1% (2) suggested fewer doses per day as a valuable compliance enhancing intervention.

Conclusions:: A substantial proportion of patients had problems with complying with eye drop treatment similar to previous evidence in smaller samples. Correlates of NC, male gender, younger patients and fewer doses, seemed quite robust. Clinicians should regularly screen for NC during routine follow-up. Patients at risk should be referred for compliance enhancing interventions. A possible pathway to improve compliance may be the reduction of daily doses.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: prevalence/incidence • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: risk factor assessment 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×