May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Comparative Efficacy of Intracameral Antibiotics versus Drug Delivery Intraocular Lens in Endophthalmitis Rabbit Model
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Y. Tsuchiya
    Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
    Dept of Ophthalmology,
  • S. Kobayakawa
    Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
    Dept of Ophthalmology,
  • A. Tsuji
    Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
    Infection Control and Prevention,
  • T. Arimura
    Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
    Dept of Ophthalmology,
  • K. Watanabe
    Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
    Dept of Ophthalmology,
  • H. Watanabe
    Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
    Dept of Ophthalmology,
  • T. Tochikubo
    Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
    Dept of Ophthalmology,
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Y. Tsuchiya, None; S. Kobayakawa, None; A. Tsuji, None; T. Arimura, None; K. Watanabe, None; H. Watanabe, None; T. Tochikubo, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 4740. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Y. Tsuchiya, S. Kobayakawa, A. Tsuji, T. Arimura, K. Watanabe, H. Watanabe, T. Tochikubo; Comparative Efficacy of Intracameral Antibiotics versus Drug Delivery Intraocular Lens in Endophthalmitis Rabbit Model. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):4740.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To evaluate the in vivo efficacy of intracameral gatifloxacin(GFLX) 0.5% versus drug delivery intraocular lens (D.D.IOL)in the treatment of Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis inrabbits.

 
Methods:
 

Experimental endophthalmitis was induced in rabbits by intracameraladministration of E.faecalis KOS1 at the end of cataract surgerywith IOL implantation (106 CFU/eye). E. faecalis strain, KOS1(clinical isolate from endophthalmitis case) were used. IntracameralGFLX 0.5% were administered at the end of surgery (immediatelypostinfection). Silicone IOLs were used for intracameral antibioticsgroup. D.D.IOLs, antibiotics-treated hydrogel lenses, were immersedin GFLX 0.5%. Those eyes were enucleated at 24 hr, 48 hr and72 hr postinfection. Bacterial population within those eyeswas examined. Aqueous concentrations for GFLX were detectedin both groups using by HPLC.

 
Results:
 

Tables showed the bacterial populations in eyes , and aqueousconcentrations for GFLX through 72 hr. Both intracameral GFLXgroup and D.D.IOL group performed significantly better thancontrol in the treatment of endophthalmitis (P<0.01). Therewere no differences between those 2 groups. Aqueous concentrationsin intracameral GFLX group were higher than those in D.D.IOLgroup at 4 hr and 8 hr after surgery. However, at 24 hr, therewere no differences between these 2 groups.

 
Conclusions:
 

Intracameral GFLX 0.5% and D.D.IOL (adsorbed GFLX 0.5%) havesimilar efficacy in the treatment of E. faecalis endophthalmitisin rabbits. 

 

 
Keywords: endophthalmitis • intraocular lens • antibiotics/antifungals/antiparasitics 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×