May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Prevalence of Heterophoria and Its Association With Refractive Error in Australian School Children
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. F. Leone
    School of Applied Vision Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
  • K. A. Rose
    School of Applied Vision Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
  • A. Kifley
    Ophthalmology (Centre for Vision Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • M. Cosstick
    Ophthalmology (Centre for Vision Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • P. Mitchell
    Ophthalmology (Centre for Vision Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • Sydney Childhood Eye Study
    School of Applied Vision Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
  • Sydney Myopia Study
    School of Applied Vision Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships J.F. Leone, None; K.A. Rose, None; A. Kifley, None; M. Cosstick, None; P. Mitchell, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support NHMRC 253732, 2003-5
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 4841. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. F. Leone, K. A. Rose, A. Kifley, M. Cosstick, P. Mitchell, Sydney Childhood Eye Study, Sydney Myopia Study; Prevalence of Heterophoria and Its Association With Refractive Error in Australian School Children. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):4841.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To examine the prevalence of heterophoria and its relationship with refractive error in population-based random samples of 6- and 12-year old school children.

Methods:: The Sydney Myopia Study randomly selected 55 primary and secondary schools, stratified by socio-economic status. All Year 1 and Year 7 students were invited to participate. Cycloplegic autorefraction, cover/uncover, alternate cover test and prism bar cover tests at near (33cm) and distance (6m) fixation were performed. Myopia was defined as spherical equivalent ≤-0.5D; emmetropia >-0.5 to <+0.5; mild hypermetropia ≥+0.5 to <+2.00; and significant hypermetropia as ≥+2.00 in at least one eye.

Results:: Of the 4107 students who participated, 1692 (mean age 6.7 years) and 2289 (mean age 12.7 years) who had no strabismus or vertical phoria were included in this analysis. For near, exophoria was highly prevalent (Year 1: 58.3% vs. 9.2% for esophoria; Year 7: 52.2% vs. 10.4% for esophoria). For distance, there was a trend of reducing exophoria prevalence with increasing age (Year 1: 13.5%, CI 10.8-16.2%; Year 7: 7.8%, CI 4.3-11.2%) with very low rates of esophoria (Year 1: 1.0%; Year 7: 1.3%) and orthophoria the norm (Year 1: 85.4%; Year 7: 90.9%). There was a significant association between near phoria and refractive error in both the Year 1 (p=0.0296) and Year 7 students (p<0.0001). Children with hyperopia were more likely than children without significant refractive error to be esophoric at near (Year 1: OR 1.7, CI 1.1-2.8; Year 7: OR 2.9, CI 1.7-4.8). At age 12, children with myopia were more likely than children without significant refractive error to be exophoric (near: OR 2.1, CI 1.5-2.7; distance: OR 3.1, CI 2.1-4.4). It was rare for children to have both myopia and esophoria at near (Year 1: 0.06%; Year 7: 0.6%).

Conclusions:: Consistent with other studies, we found that esophoria for near was rare. This finding has implications for anti-myopia therapy using progressive addition lenses. While orthophoria has more typically been found at near in studies of comparable samples (aged 5-13 years), we found a high prevalence of exophoria at near. Differences in detailed methodology may provide a partial explanation.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: prevalence/incidence • binocular vision/stereopsis • refraction 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×