May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Intravitreal Bevacizumab vs. Panretinal Photocoagulation for the Treatment of Proliferative and Severe Non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Contralateral Eye Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • G. Garcia-Aguirre
    Retina, Asoc para Evitar la Ceguera, Mexico City, Mexico
  • E. Reyna-Castelan
    Retina, Asoc para Evitar la Ceguera, Mexico City, Mexico
  • M. Torres
    Retina, Asoc para Evitar la Ceguera, Mexico City, Mexico
  • V. Kon-Jara
    Retina, Asoc para Evitar la Ceguera, Mexico City, Mexico
  • H. Quiroz-Mercado
    Retina, Asoc para Evitar la Ceguera, Mexico City, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships G. Garcia-Aguirre, None; E. Reyna-Castelan, None; M. Torres, None; V. Kon-Jara, None; H. Quiroz-Mercado, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 5041. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      G. Garcia-Aguirre, E. Reyna-Castelan, M. Torres, V. Kon-Jara, H. Quiroz-Mercado; Intravitreal Bevacizumab vs. Panretinal Photocoagulation for the Treatment of Proliferative and Severe Non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Contralateral Eye Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):5041.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To evaluate the results (visual, electroretinographic, angiographic, complication rate) of the intravitreal injection of 2.5 mg of bevacizumab in one eye and of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in the contralateral eye of patients with symmetric proliferative (PDR) or severe non-proliferative (SNPDR) diabetic retinopathy.

Methods:: Prospective, experimental, analytic, comparative study.Patients with symmetric PDR or SNPDR without previous treatment were included. In a randomized fashion, one eye underwent PRP (2-3 sessions) and the contralateral eye was treated with 2.5 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab (3 injections in a period of four months). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), electroretinogram, fluorescein angiogram and OCT were performed at 1, 2, 4 and 6 months.

Results:: Ten patients were included, six of them female, average age 53.3 years. Five had PDR and 5 had SNPDR. BCVA worsened in 3 eyes treated with PRP and in 1 treated with bevacizumab. Macular thickness increased in 3 eyes treated with PRP and in none treated with bevacizumab. Electroretinogram B-wave decreased in 8 eyes treated with PRP and in none treated with bevacizumab. Two eyes treated with PRP developed cystic macular edema and one a vitreous hemorrhage. No complications were observed in eyes treated with bevacizumab.

Conclusions:: Intravitreal bevacizumab was as effective as PRP for the treatment of PDR and SNPDR at six months follow-up, without the adverse effects observed with PRP.

Clinical Trial:: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00347698

Keywords: diabetic retinopathy • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: treatment/prevention assessment/controlled clinical trials 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×