May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Recovery of Viable Cells from Human Conjunctival Epithelium by Minimally Invasive Techniques
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Y. Diebold
    Ocular Surface Group-IOBA, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
  • H. Martínez-Osorio
    Ocular Surface Group-IOBA, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
  • I. Fernández
    Ocular Surface Group-IOBA, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
  • V. Sáez
    Ocular Surface Group-IOBA, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
  • M. Calonge
    Ocular Surface Group-IOBA, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Y. Diebold, None; H. Martínez-Osorio, None; I. Fernández, None; V. Sáez, None; M. Calonge, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support FEDER-CICYT MAT 2004-03484-C02 and 04792-C02; JCyL VA003C05
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 5314. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Y. Diebold, H. Martínez-Osorio, I. Fernández, V. Sáez, M. Calonge; Recovery of Viable Cells from Human Conjunctival Epithelium by Minimally Invasive Techniques. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):5314.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: The possibility to culture cells from ocular surface epithelium obtained by minimally invasive techniques, such as Impression Cytology (IC) or Brush Cytology (BC) has not been developed yet. This research intends to test different variables in order to recover the highest possible numbers of viable cells from IC and BC samples.

Methods:: Epithelial cells were obtained from superior bulbar or tarsal conjunctiva of healthy donors by IC (n=32) or BC (n=18). Polyether sulfone filters (pore size 0.20µm) were used for IC and CytobrushTM-plus GT for BC. By IC, a first sample was collected (superficial IC), followed by a second one at the exact same spot (deep IC). Cells were removed from filters by i) vortex agitation, ii) dispase digestion for 1, 5, 10 or 15 min, or iii) placing filters onto plastic culture dishes as ‘explants’. DMEM/F12 culture medium supplemented with 2 ng/ml EGF, 1 µg/ml insulin, 0.1 µg/ml cholera toxin, 0.5 µg/ml hydrocortisone, and 10% FBS was used to maintain cells. As controls, full-thickness biopsies (n=3) were taken after superficial and deep ICs at the same spot. Also, cell removal from filters was checked by staining with PAS-Papanicolau. BC was performed after superficial IC and cells were detached by shaking the brush in culture medium. This procedure was repeated three times. Detached cells from both IC filters and BC were counted and viability assessed using the Trypan Blue dye exclusion test.

Results:: Conjunctival biopsies showed that after two ICs, only the basal and sometimes one more layer remained, whereas 2-3 layers remained with only a superficial IC. For IC, dispase digestion for 10 min yielded the highest cell numbers (21 x 103) and the best viability (17.6%). However, by BC the average cell number recovered was 136 x 103 and the average viability was 21%.

Conclusions:: BC seems to be preferable over IC to recover viable cells. Additionally, other interdependent variables have shown to affect the retrieval of viable cells from conjunctival epithelium. BC seems to show promise as those viable cells could be further cultured and used for in vitro assays.

Keywords: conjunctiva • cell survival • clinical research methodology 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×