May 2007
Volume 48, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2007
Case-Control Study of Non-Ulcerative Contact Lens Complications in an Ophthalmic Accident and Emergency Department
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C. F. Radford
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
    Corneal and External Disease,
  • F. Stapleton
    School of Optometry and Visual Science, Institute for Eye Research and Vision CRC, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • S. Verma
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
    Accident and Emergency Department,
  • D. Minassian
    Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  • J. K. G. Dart
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
    Corneal and External Disease,
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships C.F. Radford, None; F. Stapleton, CIBA Vision, F; S. Verma, None; D. Minassian, None; J.K.G. Dart, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support The Institute for Eye Research
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2007, Vol.48, 5373. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C. F. Radford, F. Stapleton, S. Verma, D. Minassian, J. K. G. Dart; Case-Control Study of Non-Ulcerative Contact Lens Complications in an Ophthalmic Accident and Emergency Department. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(13):5373.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose:: To assess the relative risks of acute, non-ulcerative complications with contemporary contact lens (CL) wear.

Methods:: A 2 year prospective case-control study commenced in December 2003. Cases were CL wearers attending as new patients to Moorfields Eye Hospital Accident and Emergency (A&E) with CL related-disorders other than microbial keratitis. There were two groups of controls: Hospital Controls (H-Cs) were CL wearers attending A&E as new patients with a disorder unrelated to CL wear, and Population-based Controls (POP-Cs) were CL wearers randomly selected from the A&E catchment area. Persons with a medical indication for CL wear were excluded. Hospital patients completed a self-administered questionnaire, while POP-Cs were interviewed by telephone.

Results:: There were 877 cases, 1,069 H-Cs and 639 POP-Cs. Compared to planned replacement soft hydrogel (PRS) CLs, daily disposable (DD) CLs significantly reduced the risk of toxic and hypersensitivity disorders, but were associated with a 2.0x (95% confidence limits 1.5-2.6, p<0.001) increased risk of mechanical disorders and a tendency for patients to have lens removal difficulties. Silicone hydrogel (SH) CL wear was free from hypoxic complications and not significantly different to PRS for the risk of sterile keratitis, papillary conjunctivitis or acute red eye, despite greater average frequency of overnight wear. SH lenses were associated with a significantly greater risk of mechanical disorders than PRS CL (1.9x, 1.1-3.4, p=0.029). The risks for any non-ulcerative complication was similar between CL types used for daily wear, while extended wear of any soft lens increased the risk by two to four times.

Conclusions:: Neither of the two newer CL modalities (DD and SH) reduced the overall risk of hospital-presenting non-ulcerative disorders. CL wearers should be fully instructed in lens handling, appropriate use of in-eye CL lubricants, and on the risk of complications with overnight CL use.

Keywords: contact lens • cornea: clinical science 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×